journal article·2012-04

Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy study of β′-like precipitates in an Al–Mg–Ge alloy

R. Bjørge, C. Dwyer, M. Weyland, P.N.H. Nakashima, C.D. Marioara, S.J. Andersen, J. Etheridge, R. Holmestad

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Precipitates in an Al–Mg–Ge alloy similar to the β′ phase in Al–Mg–Si alloys were investigated using qualitative and quantitative aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM). The needle-shaped β′-Ge precipitates are coherent with the Al matrix along the needle direction which is parallel to a 〈0 0 1〉 Al direction, as well as one direction in the cross-section plane that is parallel to a 〈1 0 0〉 Al direction. This is linked to a smaller lattice parameter in the needle cross-section plane than that of coarser, less coherent β′ precipitates in Al–Mg–Si alloys, despite Ge having a larger atomic radius than Si. Quantitative HAADF STEM results show that the nominal Ge columns of the β′-Ge precipitates are not fully occupied by Ge, the intensity of these columns being consistent with an Al concentration of 30 ± 10%, or a vacancy concentration of 20 ± 10%. The coherent interface is atomically smooth, but with matrix columns containing Ge spaced periodically along the interface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Hasting · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 106 · 12352710.1063/1.3269714 ↗
2. Andersen · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 328310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00493-X ↗
3. Vissers · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 381510.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.032 ↗
4. Andersen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 444 · 15710.1016/j.msea.2006.08.084 ↗
5. Andersen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 390 · 12710.1016/j.msea.2004.09.019 ↗
6. Marioara · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 41 · 47110.1007/s10853-005-2470-1 ↗
7. Bjørge · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41 · 190710.1007/s11661-010-0301-8 ↗
8. Bjørge · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 610310.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.021 ↗
9. Kovarik · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 99910.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.033 ↗
10. Dwyer · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98 · 20190910.1063/1.3590171 ↗
11. Donnadieu · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 46210.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.044 ↗
12. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 46410.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.025 ↗
13. LeBeau · Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 108 · 165310.1016/j.ultramic.2008.07.001 ↗
14. LeBeau · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 20610110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.206101 ↗
15. LeBeau · Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys · 2009 · 79 · 21411010.1103/PhysRevB.79.214110 ↗
16. Rosenauer · Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 117110.1016/j.ultramic.2009.05.003 ↗
17. Kuramochi · Ultramicroscopy · 2008 · 109 · 9610.1016/j.ultramic.2008.08.007 ↗
18. LeBeau · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 11810.1016/j.ultramic.2009.10.001 ↗
19. Stadelmann · Ultramicroscopy · 1987 · 21 · 13110.1016/0304-3991(87)90080-5 ↗
20. Dwyer · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 19510.1016/j.ultramic.2009.11.009 ↗
21. Gao · Acta Crystallogr A · 1999 · 55 · 92610.1107/S0108767399005176 ↗
22. Dwyer · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 95210.1016/j.ultramic.2010.01.007 ↗
23. LeBeau · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 440510.1021/nl102025s ↗
24. Matsuda · Mater Sci Forum · 2006 · 519–521 · 22110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.221 ↗
25. Dahmen · Phys Status Solidi A Appl Res · 1983 · 80 · 24910.1002/pssa.2210800128 ↗
26. Radmilovic · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 398710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00259-1 ↗
27. Hutchinson · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 282710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00155-0 ↗
28. Haruta · Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 36110.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.004 ↗
29. Butt · Acta Crystallogr · 1993 · A49 · 17110.1107/S0108767392006974 ↗