journal article·2026-08

State-of-the-art study on pineapple, coir, and banana fiber-reinforced composites: Mechanical, thermal, and durability performance

Ashwani Kumar Singh, Ankush Thakur, Kritika Singh Somvanshi, Shivi Kesarwani, Mohammad Arif, Raman Bedi

Publisher page

Abstract

Using pineapple fiber, coir fiber, and banana fiber as a polymer reinforcement to develop sustainable composites reduces environmental pollution. This review emphasized the progress in development of composite materials based on pineapple fiber, coir fiber, and banana fiber and critically examined the influence of fiber loading and fiber size, fiber modification, micro and nanofillers, and hybridization on the properties of composite materials fabricated with several polymer matrices. This review has been specifically categorized according to the type of matrix materials used, which include conventional polymers, bio degradable polymers, and recycled polymers. The mechanical performance of hybrid composites based on pineapple fiber, coir fiber, and banana fiber fabricated with other natural and synthetic fiber composites was better than the individual fiber. Incorporation of filler materials such as alumina, SiC, nanoclay, eggshell powder, and nano-cellulose provided a significant enhancement in mechanical properties of composites. Alkaline and silane treatment of fiber is the most commonly used treatment method, and this treatment significantly enhances mechanical, thermal, and water resistance properties of composites. Life cycle assessment analysis and long-term durability analysis of composites, optimization of fiber treatment parameters for better performance of composites, and 3D printer filament development based on nano-cellulose extracted from banana, coir, and pineapple are future directions for developing sustainable materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. B R Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Technology, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malviya University of Technology, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Mechanical Engineering, PCTE Institute of Engineering & Technology, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Das G, Biswas S. Physical, mechanical and water absorption behaviour of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composites filled with Al2O3 particulates. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2016; 115(1): 012012.
2. Abu SSM, Habib MA, Abedin MZ. Experimental investigation of the mechanical and water absorption properties on fiber stacking sequence and orientation of jute/carbon epoxy hybrid composites. J Mater Res Technol 2020; 9(5): 10970–81.
3. 10.1155/2015/24394710.1155/2015/243947 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
5. Taj S, Munawar MA, Khan S. Natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Pakistan Acad Sci 2007; 44(2): 129–44.
6. Mamtaz H, Fouladi MH, Al-Atabi M, et al. Acoustic absorption of natural fiber composites. J Eng 2016; 2016: 1–11.
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014 ↗
8. 10.14429/dsj.64.732310.14429/dsj.64.7323 ↗
9. 10.1080/15440478.2022.206810710.1080/15440478.2022.2068107 ↗
10. 10.1260/03095240978914105310.1260/030952409789141053 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168441879952810.1177/0731684418799528 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12221-020-9804-010.1007/s12221-020-9804-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10892810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108928 ↗
14. 10.1007/s13399-023-04525-x10.1007/s13399-023-04525-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14241710.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142417 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10311-022-01551-510.1007/s10311-022-01551-5 ↗
17. Kovaleva IV, Galkin DG. The problem of agricultural waste and ways to solve it. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2022; 981(2): 022009.
18. Yusof NAT, Giamasrow RD, Azman AN, et al. Utilization of pineapple leaf in fiber-based dielectric composite material and its elemental composition analyses. Prog Electromagn Res M 2023; 117: 163–75.
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12824210.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128242 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.01910.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.019 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:102101392191610.1023/A:1021013921916 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
23. Sarangi PK, Singh AK, Srivastava RK, et al. Recent progress and future perspectives for zero agriculture waste technologies: pineapple waste as a case study. Sustain Times 2023; 15(4): 3575.
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.13610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.136 ↗
25. S J, Deka H, Varghese TO, et al. Recent development and future trends in coir fiber reinforced green polymer composites: review and evaluation. Polym Compos 2016; 37(37): 3296–309.
26. 10.1039/D1RA00231G10.1039/D1RA00231G ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2279410.1002/pc.22794 ↗
28. 10.1177/073168440934332410.1177/0731684409343324 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.01710.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.017 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.011 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.1995.07055040510.1002/app.1995.070550405 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.004 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12424010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124240 ↗
34. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102041-8.00003-210.1016/B978-0-08-102041-8.00003-2 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma905037010.3390/ma9050370 ↗
36. 10.3390/buildings501028210.3390/buildings5010282 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.02110.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.021 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.04010.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.040 ↗
39. Bansal S, Raichurkar P. Experimental study of bamboo using banana and linen fibre reinforced polymeric composites. Perspect Sci 2016; 8: 313–6.
40. 10.1080/15440478.2020.177666510.1080/15440478.2020.1776665 ↗
41. 10.3329/bjsir.v53i2.3666810.3329/bjsir.v53i2.36668 ↗
42. 10.1002/mame.20040013210.1002/mame.200400132 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.07410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.074 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2797910.1002/pc.27979 ↗
45. Jawaid M, Asim M, Tahir PM, et al. Pineapple leaf fibers processing. Properties and applications. Berlin: Green Energy and Technology, Springer, 2020.
46. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2669810.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26698 ↗
47. 10.3390/fib908005110.3390/fib9080051 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.056 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.17910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.179 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.00210.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.002 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00163-310.1016/S0960-8524(02)00163-3 ↗
52. 10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z ↗
53. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
54. 10.1002/pc.2046110.1002/pc.20461 ↗
55. Somvanshi KS, Gope PC. A review on properties of nano biocomposite film for packaging applications from cellulose nano fiber. Int J Eng Res Afr 2021; 11(1): 29–39.
56. Todkar SS, Patil SA. Review on mechanical properties evaluation of pineapple leaf fibre (PALF) reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B 2019; 174(May): 106927.10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106927 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.16910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.169 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.10110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101 ↗
59. 10.1155/2015/95056710.1155/2015/950567 ↗
60. 10.1002/pc.2815110.1002/pc.28151 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10876810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108768 ↗
62. Chawla KK. Glass fibers. In: Encyclopedia of materials: Science and technology. 2016; 676–80.
63. Ashik KP, Sharma RS. A review on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. J Miner Mater Char Eng 2015; 03(5): 420–6.
64. 10.1007/s11837-005-0217-810.1007/s11837-005-0217-8 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.mser.2017.01.00210.1016/j.mser.2017.01.002 ↗
66. Marcio loos. Composites. In: Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites. Norwich, NY: William Andrew Applied science Publisher, 2015. p. 37–72.
67. Singh MK, Tewari R, Zafar S, et al. A comprehensive review of various factors for application feasibility of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Results Mater 2023; 17: 100355–41.
68. 10.1201/978142005780510.1201/9781420057805 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.020 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.02010.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.020 ↗
71. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69427510.1080/01694243.2012.694275 ↗
72. 10.1016/0167-577X(93)90119-I10.1016/0167-577X(93)90119-I ↗
73. 10.1002/app.1995.07057070810.1002/app.1995.070570708 ↗
74. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-9 ↗
75. 10.1002/app.3291010.1002/app.32910 ↗
76. Syduzzaman M, Akter M, Mahmud F, et al. Tensile properties of banana fiber reinforced recycled high-density polyethylene composites: an experimental investigation. SPE Polym 2024; 5: 306–317.
77. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.021 ↗
78. 10.1163/156855498X0015310.1163/156855498X00153 ↗
79. 10.1177/089270571663286010.1177/0892705716632860 ↗
80. 10.1007/s42824-024-00116-x10.1007/s42824-024-00116-x ↗
81. 10.1002/app.3819710.1002/app.38197 ↗
82. Pérez‐Fonseca AA, Arellano M, Rodrigue D, et al. Effect of coupling agent content and water absorption on the mechanical properties of coir-agave fibers reinforced polyethylene hybrid composites. Polym Compos 2016; 37(16): 3015–24.
83. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-910.1016/S0266-3538(97)00161-9 ↗
84. 10.1021/ie900824c10.1021/ie900824c ↗
85. 10.1002/pc.2218410.1002/pc.22184 ↗
86. 10.1007/s10965-012-9847-z10.1007/s10965-012-9847-z ↗
87. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.08010.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.080 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.06210.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.062 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.046 ↗
90. 10.1177/002199830934464710.1177/0021998309344647 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14436810.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144368 ↗
92. Kengkhetkit N, Amornsakchai T. Utilisation of pineapple leaf waste for plastic reinforcement: 1. A novel extraction method for short pineapple leaf fiber. Ind Crops Prod 2012; 40(1): 55–61.
93. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.21.3110.4028/www.scientific.net/NHC.21.31 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.00510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.005 ↗
95. 10.3390/polym1504083010.3390/polym15040830 ↗
96. Motaleb KZMA, Islam MS, Hoque MB. Improvement of physicomechanical properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced composite. Int J Biomater. 2018; 2018(1): 7384360.
97. 10.1007/s12221-014-1023-010.1007/s12221-014-1023-0 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.002 ↗
99. Maleque MA, Belal FY, Sapuan SM. Mechanical properties study of pseudo-stem banana fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Arabian J Sci Eng 2007; 32(2 B): 359–64.
100. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗