Unveiling synergistic and mechanical performance of hybrid fiber metal laminates by optimized aluminum/basalt/pineapple fiber stacking sequence
Source abstract
Abstract
Structural components require materials with high strength and low weight to optimize their performance, which can be effectively achieved through hybridization of reinforcement and strategic layering arrangements in fiber metal laminates (FML). This research investigation explores the synergetic effect of basalt and pineapple fiber mats with Aluminum 6061 skin with epoxy matrix. Four different layering sequences of FML are fabricated using the vacuum bag molding process, and their mechanical characteristics, including tensile, flexural, and Mode I fracture toughness, were examined according to ASTM standards. The result analysis indicates that the highest tensile strength and modulus of 67.73 MPa and 2.73 GPa, flexural strength and modulus of 88.5 MPa and 2.77 GPa respectively was obtained in Specimen 2 having a stacking sequence of Aluminum/Basalt/Pineapple/Pineapple/Basalt/Aluminum. The basalt fiber contributes to high strength and durability, while pineapple fibers enhance flexibility. These outstanding properties are resulted from the synergistic effects of combining materials with complementary properties in an optimized stacking sequence. Furthermore, the layering sequence significantly influences the mechanical behavior, with basalt fibers placed in the outer layers improving fracture toughness, and pineapple fibers enhancing strain energy absorption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Rajalakshmi Engineering College
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/ntrev-2023-016410.1515/ntrev-2023-0164 ↗
2. Zhen CP. Review on dynamic impact characteristics of metal laminates. Journal of Advanced Review on Scientific Research 2015; 16(1): 1–11.
3. 10.3390/met1304063810.3390/met13040638 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12221-023-00281-x10.1007/s12221-023-00281-x ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1602017310.3390/polym16020173 ↗
6. Santhosh M, Sasikumar R, Thangavel T, et al. Fabrication and characterisation of basalt/kevlar/aluminium/fiber metal laminates for automobile applications. Int J Mater Sci 2019; 14(1). https://api.semanticscholar.org
7. Vishwas M, Vinya M Development and mechanical characterization of light-weight fiber metal laminate using jute, kenaf, and aluminium. Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures 2024; 11(2): 259–327.
8. Mohammed I, Abu TAR, Hameed Sultan MT, et al. Mechanical properties of fibre-metal laminates made of natural/synthetic fibre composites. Bio Resource 2018; 13(1): 2022–2034.
9. Rajesh Jesudoss Hynes N, Vignesh NJ, Winowlin Jappes JT, et al. Effect-of-stacking-sequence-of-fibre-metal-laminates-with-carbon-fibre-reinforced-composites. Compos Sci Technol 2022; 221: 16.
10. IqbalTeuku Firsa MMSS, Abhang SAALB Bending strength of fiber metal laminate based on abaca fiber reinforced polyester and aluminum alloy metal sheet. Key Eng Mater 2021; 892: 34–41.
11. Li X, Yahya MY, Nia AB, et al. Dynamic failure of fiber-metal laminates under impact loading-experimental observations. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2015; 35: 1–15.
12. Jia X Wang W-X Zhang J-Z et al. Progressive failure analysis of the fiber metal laminates based on chopped carbon fiber strands. J Reinforc Plast Compos; 34(5): 364–376.10.1177/0731684415571659 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441663377010.1177/0731684416633770 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.40710.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.407 ↗
16. Sadegh M Eslami-Farsani R Ebrahimnezhad-Khaljiri H. Shear performances of laminated aluminum/ jute–basalt fibers epoxy composites containing carbon nanotubes: as multi-scale hybrid structures. Thin-Walled Struct; 179: 109690.10.1016/j.tws.2022.109690 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.asej.2024.10275910.1016/j.asej.2024.102759 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10794210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107942 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.62410.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.624 ↗
20. Yathish Muddappa PP, Rajanna T, Giridhara G. Effects of different interlaminar hybridization and localized edge loads on the vibration and buckling behavior of fiber metal composite laminates. Composites Part C 2021; 4: 100084.
21. 10.3390/polym1320348710.3390/polym13203487 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.09010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.090 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.10910.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.109 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1318412510.3390/ma13184125 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1207150110.3390/polym12071501 ↗
26. 10.1177/0954406222113422310.1177/09544062221134223 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102131-6.00006-210.1016/B978-0-08-102131-6.00006-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e0081210.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00812 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009 ↗
31. 10.3390/pr809114710.3390/pr8091147 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-023-43723-510.1038/s41598-023-43723-5 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00170-020-05427-210.1007/s00170-020-05427-2 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10896310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108963 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10794210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107942 ↗
36. Wei Z, Hong X, Jian W, et al. Characterization and properties of AA6061-based fiber metal laminates with different aluminum-surface pretreatments. Compos Struct 2019; 227(5): 111321.
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.02810.1016/j.msea.2010.04.028 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11503610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115036 ↗
39. 10.1515/secm-2017-018010.1515/secm-2017-0180 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.06.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2005.06.002 ↗
41. 10.1080/15376494.2021.197362510.1080/15376494.2021.1973625 ↗
42. 10.1002/adem.20220179110.1002/adem.202201791 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.03.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.03.003 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12221-020-1209-610.1007/s12221-020-1209-6 ↗