Investigating fabric interlayer effects on tensile loading limits of adhesively bonded single-lap composite joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates enhancing the effectiveness of glass fiber/epoxy composite single-lap bonded joints by using fabric interlayers between the adherends. It was aimed to evaluate the changes in the joint tensile strength depending on the parameters such as different interlayer fabric types (S2-glass fabric and Kevlar fabric), numbers of interlayers (0, 1, 2, and 3), clamping pressure (0, 4, and 6 MPa), and temperature (20, 55, and 80°C) applied to the joint region throughout the curing period. Significant enhancements in peak tensile forces were observed by varying these parameters. The most substantial increase in tensile properties was achieved for the joint with two-layer S2 fabric fabricated at 4 MPa pressure and 55°C curing temperature, denoted as “2L-S2-P4-T55.” Compared to a non-layered joint, those with 1, 2, and 3 S2 fabric interlayers exhibited 35.5%, 39.6%, and 45.2% increases in tensile peak force, respectively. Increasing bonding pressure from 0 MPa to 4 MPa resulted in a 5.2% tensile failure load increase for double S2 fabric interlayered joints cured at 20°C, but a 6.7% decrease at 6 MPa. Using one-layer Kevlar fabric instead of one-layer S2 fabric caused a 15.2% drop in tensile peak force, still 14.9% higher than the non-layered joint.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Manisa Celal Bayar University
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.01510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.015 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.02410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.024 ↗
3. 10.1080/15376494.2019.163908610.1080/15376494.2019.1639086 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11392310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113923 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.01910.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.019 ↗
6. 10.1080/00218464.2014.90380210.1080/00218464.2014.903802 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.052 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.031 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00004-010.1016/S0143-7496(02)00004-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.08.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.08.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.093 ↗
16. 10.1080/15376494.2022.216264110.1080/15376494.2022.2162641 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10333610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103336 ↗
18. 10.1177/002199830203601417210.1177/0021998302036014172 ↗
19. 10.1080/0021846080188835910.1080/00218460801888359 ↗
20. 10.1080/09243046.2013.78280510.1080/09243046.2013.782805 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40430-021-02920-x10.1007/s40430-021-02920-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11610810.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116108 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.09410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.094 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.01310.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.013 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2648510.1002/pc.26485 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10314110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103141 ↗
27. 10.1080/01694243.2014.99106010.1080/01694243.2014.991060 ↗
28. 10.1080/00218464.2014.96118710.1080/00218464.2014.961187 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.046 ↗
30. 10.1080/00218464.2016.118706910.1080/00218464.2016.1187069 ↗
31. 10.1177/002199831881758810.1177/0021998318817588 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10315910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103159 ↗
33. 10.1080/00218464.2021.194781110.1080/00218464.2021.1947811 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11035810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110358 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10787410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107874 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10336510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103365 ↗
37. 10.1515/mt-2022-028410.1515/mt-2022-0284 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10361310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103613 ↗
39. Documents-composite products-product sheets. https://www.dostkimya.com/en/documents (accessed 7 November 2023).
40. EC152/W152LR-Product information. https://cristex.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/EC-152-W-152-LR.pdf (accessed 5 November 2023).
41. Loctite EA 9466-technical data sheet. https://datasheets.tdx.henkel.com/LOCTITE-EA-9466-en_GL.pdf (accessed 7 November 2023).
42. Standard test method for lap shear adhesion for fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) bonding 2014. https://www.astm.org/d5868-01r14.html (accessed 7 August 2023).
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.005 ↗
44. 10.1080/0021846060094851110.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
45. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00106-310.1016/S0263-8223(99)00106-3 ↗
46. 10.1243/03093247V09318510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
47. 10.5589/q06-01810.5589/q06-018 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11399910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113999 ↗
49. Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints 2019. https://www.astm.org/d5573-99r19.html (accessed 7 November 2023).
50. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-044210.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0442 ↗