A review of the performance of polymer parts printed on fused deposition modelling under cyclic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of the most promising and widely used additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. FDM is commonly used to fabricate simple to complex 3D parts from polymeric materials. Different 3D-printed polymeric components manufactured using FDM technology exhibit various mechanical and load-bearing properties. They are utilized in various industries, particularly the medical industry, for load-bearing applications in bio-implants. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the mechanical characteristics, especially the fatigue behaviour, of these 3D-printed parts under cyclic loadings. This paper focuses on the dynamic behaviour of 3D-printed polymeric parts produced through the FDM process and under different loading modes. First, the FDM mechanism, the various polymeric materials used in FDM, and the effective FDM parameters are briefly introduced. Then, the paper comprehensively covers one of the most important mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed parts for load-bearing applications: their fatigue life under different printing conditions and cyclic loadings. The most influential factors on the fatigue behaviour of polymers include the type of polymeric material, surrounding environmental conditions, cyclic loading conditions, the type of testing specimen, and the FDM printing parameters (such as raster angle, infill density, nozzle diameter, and nozzle temperature). In addition to the anisotropic behaviour reported by various studies on 3D-printed parts using FDM, it has been concluded that the layered structure (with a large number of interfaces between the raster) and the presence of microholes are two factors that weaken the fatigue strength of 3D-printed structures compared to other fabrication processes. These conditions can be exacerbated by choosing inappropriate printing parameters, and often, the failure mechanism in 3D-printed parts fabricated with FDM is delamination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xijing University
Funding
Shaanxi Province Department of Science and Thechnology · Initial Scientific Research Fund for Special Zone Talents
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Dowling NE. Mechanical behavior of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue. Indianapolis, Indiana: Pearson Education Limited, 2013, pp. 936.
2. 10.1007/s10853-021-06034-610.1007/s10853-021-06034-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.04310.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.043 ↗
4. 10.1002/mame.20230011410.1002/mame.202300114 ↗
5. Mallick PK. Thermoplastics and thermoplastic–matrix composites for lightweight automotive structures. Mater Des Manuf Light Veh 2021: 187–228.
6. 10.1002/adem.20190106510.1002/adem.201901065 ↗
7. 10.1177/073168441880730010.1177/0731684418807300 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.07610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.076 ↗
9. 10.1002/mame.20220056810.1002/mame.202200568 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10121810.1016/j.addma.2020.101218 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym1424544610.3390/polym14245446 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
13. 10.1002/adem.20220130910.1002/adem.202201309 ↗
14. 10.1080/17452759201491340010.1080/174527592014913400 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-981-10-1082-8_310.1007/978-981-10-1082-8_3 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab3d1810.1088/1361-665X/ab3d18 ↗
17. 10.1089/3dp.2015.003610.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10688410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106884 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-023-08460-010.1007/s10853-023-08460-0 ↗
20. 10.1002/mame.20220067710.1002/mame.202200677 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.255610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.2556 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11665-021-05848-410.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
23. 10.3390/mi1109087310.3390/mi11090873 ↗
24. 10.1039/c8ay02092b10.1039/c8ay02092b ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.53510.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.535 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1206088710.3390/ma12060887 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.05.00210.1016/j.mfglet.2022.05.002 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac77cb10.1088/1361-665X/ac77cb ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1211249210.3390/polym12112492 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40964-017-0023-110.1007/s40964-017-0023-1 ↗
32. 10.1177/07316844231157790/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_07316844231157790-IMG01JPEG10.1177/07316844231157790/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_07316844231157790-IMG01JPEG ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10721310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107213 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10568510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105685 ↗
35. 10.1533/9780857090836.1.11310.1533/9780857090836.1.113 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.28310.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.283 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10600710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 ↗
38. 10.4028/p-OcvW8O10.4028/p-OcvW8O ↗
39. 10.1007/s40964-015-0002-310.1007/s40964-015-0002-3 ↗
40. 10.1088/1757-899X/269/1/01206010.1088/1757-899X/269/1/012060 ↗
41. Fischer M, Schöppner V. Fatigue behavior of FDM parts manufactured with ultem 9085. JOM (J Occup Med) 2017; 69: 563–568.
42. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-008610.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0086 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1314236210.3390/polym13142362 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.07210.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.072 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.finmec.2021.10001610.1016/j.finmec.2021.100016 ↗
46. 10.3390/MI1402030410.3390/MI14020304 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10756210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107562 ↗
48. 10.1177/073168441775047710.1177/0731684417750477 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.48410.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.00910.1016/j.cirpj.2020.05.009 ↗
51. 10.1007/s12540-019-00272-910.1007/s12540-019-00272-9 ↗
52. 10.3390/jcs401001710.3390/jcs4010017 ↗
53. 10.1108/1355254061065244710.1108/13552540610652447 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.07810.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.078 ↗
55. Al-Ghamdi KA. Sustainable FDM additive manufacturing of ABS components with emphasis on energy minimized and time efficient lightweight construction. Int J Light Mater Manuf 2019; 2: 338–345.
56. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.43510.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.435 ↗
57. Srinivasan R Pridhar T Ramprasath LS et al. Prediction of tensile strength in FDM printed ABS parts using response surface methodology (RSM). In: Materials today: proceedings. Amsterdam Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd pp. 1827–1832.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.788 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
59. 10.1007/s00170-014-5835-210.1007/s00170-014-5835-2 ↗
60. 10.1007/s00170-019-03313-010.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 ↗
61. 10.1007/s11665-016-2157-610.1007/s11665-016-2157-6 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.69710.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.697 ↗
63. 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/01213710.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012137 ↗
64. 10.1002/app.4908710.1002/app.49087 ↗