journal article·2026-01

Dynamic load characteristics and performance degradation of CFRP wing-body connection lugs under elevated temperature wet conditions

Di Gai, Shengjie Yu, Hai Xu, Kang Yang, Zhipeng Yao, Shiyu Yang, Zheng Zhao

Publisher page

Abstract

The elevated temperature wet (ETW) conditions have a significant impact on the mechanical properties of the CFRP main load-bearing components in all-carbon fiber aircraft, thereby influencing the aircraft’s service life. This paper utilizes a full-scale CFRP wing-body connection structure to study its static load characteristics under elevated temperature wet conditions and its fatigue performance under flight loads. Under ETW conditions (71°C, 85% RH) for 35 days, the average moisture content reached 0.5707%. Structural stiffness decreased by 49.67% under static load in ETW conditions, with displacement exhibiting a two-stage behavior in both environments. During the full load spectrum test, the stiffness degradation rate under ETW conditions increased by 47.3%. In the constant peak load test, structural stiffness exhibited three stages: initial enhancement-gradual reduction-rapid reduction following local damage. Numerical calculations identified the fillet transition and opening positions as weak points. The fatigue safety factor based on strength criteria significantly decreased under high-temperature and humid conditions, showing an inverse relationship with the load value.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenyang Aerospace University

Shenyang Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Center of Civil Aviation of China

Liaoning General Aviation Research Institute

Army Shenyang Military Bureau

Funding

Civil Aviation Safety Capacity Building Fund · This study was co-supported by the Study on airworthiness of corrosion-prone structural parts of general aviation Ruixiang aircraft under dynamic and static load conditions

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2021/551984210.1155/2021/5519842 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2022.315299510.1109/JPROC.2022.3152995 ↗
3. 10.1109/TTE.2015.242649910.1109/TTE.2015.2426499 ↗
4. 10.19694/j.cnki.issn2095-2457.2022.23.0710.19694/j.cnki.issn2095-2457.2022.23.07 ↗
5. Fan Z, Yang F, Xiang S, et al. Development status and suggestions of electric aircraft in China [J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology 2019; 30(11): 18–21.
6. Yang F, Fan Z, Xiang S, et al. Technology innovation and practice of electric aircraft in China [J]. Acta Aeronautica Astronautica Sinica2021; 42(03): 7–12.
7. 10.13645/j.cnki.f.d.20210309.00610.13645/j.cnki.f.d.20210309.006 ↗
8. Liu YG, Lu X, Tan N, et al. Experimental study and theoretical model study on moisture and heat properties of aviation carbon fiber composites. High-tech fibers and applications 2017; 42(03): 18–21+29.
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.02610.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.026 ↗
10. 10.11868/j.issn.1001-4381.2020.00066210.11868/j.issn.1001-4381.2020.000662 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40430-022-03673-x10.1007/s40430-022-03673-x ↗
12. 10.1177/0731684421101175710.1177/07316844211011757 ↗
13. 10.1051/jnwpu/2022401003310.1051/jnwpu/20224010033 ↗
14. Zhao XP, Sun SS, Wang Y. Macroscopic mechanical analysis of bending strength of glass/carbon fiber hybrid composites in hot and humid environment. Composite materials science and engineering 2022; 09: 41–47+75.
15. Yang J. Study on delamination failure mechanism of underlayer composite in wet and thermal environment based on acoustic emission technology. Zhejiang University, 2016.
16. Niu YF, Li ZQ, Zhu XF. Interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites under full wet heat field. Polym Mater Sci Eng 2021; 37(04): 113–120.
17. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11185410.1016/j.tws.2024.111854 ↗
18. Sun X, Tong MB, Chen Z, et al. Residual compressive strength of carbon fiber fabric laminated composite after fatigue in wet and hot environment. J Compos Mater 2016; 33(03): 535–544.
19. Xu MR, Zeng BY, Xiong X, et al. Study on tensile fatigue properties of carbon fiber laminates in hot and humid environment. Journal of Beihang University. 2023; 1–13.
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10694210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106942 ↗
24. Wang FS, Ouyang JJ, Kong FQ, et al. The influence of stress ratio on fatigue properties of T700 carbon fiber composites was studied based on DIC. Composite materials science and engineering 2020; 11: 54–60.
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.023 ↗
26. Xu WC. Research on integrated multi-objective optimization design method of multi-material assembly wheel structure, connection and performance. Jilin University, 2021.
27. Ma LM, Zhang JZ, Yue GQ, et al. Application of composite materials in a new generation of large civil aircraft. J Compos Mater 2015; 32(02): 317–322.
28. Han KH. Analysis method of instantaneous response of coupled wet, heat and force for bonding repair of composite materials. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013.
29. Yang XD, An T, Zhou TC, et al. Effect of wet and thermal environment on mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced resin matrix composites and damage mechanism. Material engineering 2019; 47(07): 84–91.
30. 10.1016/j.aej.2022.12.05810.1016/j.aej.2022.12.058 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.10664610.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106646 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10625110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106251 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831881212710.1177/0021998318812127 ↗
34. Xu W, Wang D. Fatigue/impact analysis and structure-connection-performance integration multi-objective optimization of a bolted carbon fiber reinforced polymer/aluminum assembled wheel. Compos B Eng. 2022; 2022.
35. ASTMD5229 standard test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International 2008.
36. AC20-107B COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 2009.
37. ASTMD3518 standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a 45° laminate. ASTM International 2007.
38. ASTMD6641 standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (CLC) test fixture. ASTM International 2008.
39. ASTMD3039M standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International 2008.