Improved 3D image segmentation for X-ray tomographic data of biaxial warp-knitted composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Identifying different features and phases within the biaxial warp-knitted composites enables accurate characterization of the internal changes of the composites under complex loading conditions and different processing parameters. However, obtaining 3D reconstructions that can be accurately segmented and quantitatively analyzed is still a challenge, primarily due to the low attenuation of materials, especially the low contrast between the weft yarn and warp yarns. Here, we use deep learning approaches to identify the boundary of the section of the tow on the 2D image, extract individual warp or weft tows automatically, and this is followed by computational modeling of composite materials. The results show that the performance of ResUNet++ model is better than that of other models for the biaxial warp-knitted composite specimen segmentation tasks. The special improved dataset augmentation algorithm is also a positive effective way to enhance network performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang Sci-tech University Hangzhou
Zhejiang University
CenterSinohydro Bureau 12, Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Program · Science Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.024 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10858510.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108585 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11302010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113020 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.036 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443-017-9601-010.1007/s10443-017-9601-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.016 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10443-020-09852-010.1007/s10443-020-09852-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00121-410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00121-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.031 ↗
10. 10.1177/004051751141856210.1177/0040517511418562 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00061-710.1016/S1359-835X(03)00061-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.036 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma1304093610.3390/ma13040936 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11234710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112347 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.12.026 ↗
17. 10.1533/joti.2005.000510.1533/joti.2005.0005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10563910.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105639 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.finel.2018.05.00210.1016/j.finel.2018.05.002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.028 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma612556810.3390/ma6125568 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.023 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.004 ↗
26. 10.1177/096739111602400210.1177/0967391116024002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.023 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10782010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107820 ↗
29. 10.1179/1743284714Y.000000056110.1179/1743284714Y.0000000561 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.04.02010.1016/j.tafmec.2017.04.020 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11275810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112758 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.025 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.066 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10556110.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105561 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10853-020-05225-x10.1007/s10853-020-05225-x ↗
36. 10.1109/ISBI.2010.549037410.1109/ISBI.2010.5490374 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.02.00510.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.02.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.005 ↗
39. 10.1002/CPA.316042050310.1002/CPA.3160420503 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.12.02110.1016/j.patrec.2018.12.021 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12665-021-10133-710.1007/s12665-021-10133-7 ↗
42. 10.1109/ICC.2019.876110510.1109/ICC.2019.8761105 ↗
43. 10.1109/ISCAS.2018.835155010.1109/ISCAS.2018.8351550 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11601410.1016/j.eswa.2021.116014 ↗
45. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_2810.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
47. 10.3390/rs1207112810.3390/rs12071128 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_110.1007/978-3-030-00889-5_1 ↗
49. 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2020.64.2.02050810.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2020.64.2.020508 ↗
50. Chaudhary V Buttar PK Sachan MK. Satellite imagery analysis for road segmentation using U-Net architecture. J Supercomput 2022: 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s11227-022-04379-6.10.1007/s11227-022-04379-6 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.10727210.1016/j.knosys.2021.107272 ↗
52. 10.3389/fmats.2021.76122910.3389/fmats.2021.761229 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.067 ↗
54. 10.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_310.1007/978-3-030-85292-4_3 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10987910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109879 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10871310.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108713 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.10326010.1016/j.jdent.2019.103260 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.00610.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.006 ↗
59. 10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_210.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_2 ↗
60. 10.1109/JBHI.2021.304930410.1109/JBHI.2021.3049304 ↗
61. 10.1109/JBHI.2020.302347610.1109/JBHI.2020.3023476 ↗
62. 10.1080/07391102.2020.176721210.1080/07391102.2020.1767212 ↗