A review on process parameter influence and optimization for 3D printing of fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing technology has the potential to bring about significant technological changes to polymer matrix composites. In comparison to traditional manufacturing processes, 3D printing technology is being increasingly utilized in a variety of industries, including aerospace, vehicles, transportation, and medical engineering. The advantages of this technology include low cost, rapid prototyping, and the ability to manufacture complex structures. Nevertheless, the mutual influence and constraints of process parameters in the manufacturing process have led to the fact that the properties of 3D-printed composites have not been able to fully meet the requirements of practical applications. This paper focuses on the current development of the 3D printing process for fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. This paper especially reviews the research on the influence of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process parameters (printing temperature, printing speed, ply thickness, and printing path, among others) on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. It discusses the problems brought about by the process parameters in the manufacturing process and proposes possible solutions. Finally, it considers the future development prospects and research directions of additive manufacturing of thermoplastic composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tongji University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Laboratory of Design and Manufacturing for Composite Structures, Ministry of Education · Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning · National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20230067210.1002/adem.202300672 ↗
2. Mahmoud Zaghloul MY, Yousry Zaghloul MM, Yousry Zaghloul MM. Developments in polyester composite materials – an in-depth review on natural fibres and nano fillers. Compos Struct 2021: 278.
3. 10.1080/03602559.2018.147172010.1080/03602559.2018.1471720 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1315247410.3390/polym13152474 ↗
5. Fang G, Zhang T, Huang Y, et al. Exceptional mechanical performance by spatial printing with continuous fiber: curved slicing, toolpath generation and physical verification. Addit Manuf 2024; 82: 104048.
6. Liu P, Hou Z, Tian X, et al. Evaluation and prediction of tensile properties of 3D-printed continuous carbon/Kevlar fiber-filled composites by coaxial hybrid process. Polym Compos 2024.
7. 10.1002/pc.2747710.1002/pc.27477 ↗
8. 10.3390/polym1006066610.3390/polym10060666 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14624710.1016/j.cej.2023.146247 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1421465910.3390/polym14214659 ↗
11. 10.1089/ten.tea.2023.019310.1089/ten.tea.2023.0193 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b0660710.1021/acsami.8b06607 ↗
15. 10.1177/875608791877352110.1177/8756087918773521 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1318401510.3390/ma13184015 ↗
17. Ragunathan S, Affandi RD, Ismail H, et al. The compatibilizing effect of polypropylene maleic anhydride (PPMAH) on polypropylene (PP)/Acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR)/Palm kernel shell (PKS) composites. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2016; 11: 1666–1672.
18. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.10710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.107 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.002 ↗
20. 10.3390/ma1221352910.3390/ma12213529 ↗
21. 10.1177/073168441880730010.1177/0731684418807300 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11004410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110044 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9QM00006B10.1039/C9QM00006B ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.03.03010.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.03.030 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.01610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.001 ↗
28. 10.3390/jcs602004110.3390/jcs6020041 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.2c0207610.1021/acsami.2c02076 ↗
30. 10.1080/17452759.2023.228541710.1080/17452759.2023.2285417 ↗
31. 10.1007/s42823-022-00358-210.1007/s42823-022-00358-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
35. Custompart.net. Available online: https://www.custompartnet.com (accessed on 23 May 2023).
36. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.02210.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.022 ↗
37. 10.1002/adem.20200025610.1002/adem.202000256 ↗
38. 10.1177/0731684422114083310.1177/07316844221140833 ↗
39. 10.3390/coatings1206082710.3390/coatings12060827 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2023.14597110.1016/j.msea.2023.145971 ↗
41. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
42. 10.1007/s40430-019-1630-110.1007/s40430-019-1630-1 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054 ↗
44. 10.48084/etasr.587610.48084/etasr.5876 ↗
45. 10.1088/1757-899X/1235/1/01200810.1088/1757-899X/1235/1/012008 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4 ↗
47. 10.2478/scjme-2019-003310.2478/scjme-2019-0033 ↗
48. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2022-013510.1108/RPJ-04-2022-0135 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.03910.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039 ↗
50. 10.1080/17843286.2020.179733010.1080/17843286.2020.1797330 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11665-016-2459-810.1007/s11665-016-2459-8 ↗
52. Parker M, Inthavong A, Law E, et al. 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide: exploring printability and importance of fiber volume fraction. Addit Manuf 2022; 54: 102763.
53. Fu SY. Hybrid effects on tensile properties of hybrid short-glass-fiber-and short-carbon-fiberreinforced polypropylene composites, 2001.
54. Reymus M, Lümkemann N, Stawarczyk B. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 231–237.
55. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.01010.1016/j.addr.2016.03.010 ↗
56. Riyaz Ahmed A, Mugendiran V. Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of PLA resin through LCD 3D printing. Proc IME E J Process Mech Eng 2024: 09544089231225147.
57. 10.3390/ma1602069510.3390/ma16020695 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002 ↗
59. 10.1002/admi.20230033710.1002/admi.202300337 ↗
60. Ling X, Jing X, Zhang C, et al. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) properties and its application status. Earth and Environmental Science 2020; 453: 012080.
61. 10.1080/25740881.2024.230253710.1080/25740881.2024.2302537 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.007 ↗
63. 10.3390/polym1606085810.3390/polym16060858 ↗
64. 10.1177/875608791769108810.1177/8756087917691088 ↗
65. 10.3390/polym1508196610.3390/polym15081966 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.08510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.085 ↗
67. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
71. 10.4236/ojcm.2016.6100310.4236/ojcm.2016.61003 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.07810.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.078 ↗
74. H Zakaria SFK, Fee MFC, Ibrahim M. Printing temperature, printing speed and raster angle variation effect in fused filament fabrication. Mater Sci Eng 2019.
75. Li N, Link G, Jelonnek J. 3D microwave printing temperature control of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 2020: 187.
76. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10323310.1016/j.addma.2022.103233 ↗
77. 10.3390/s2319806310.3390/s23198063 ↗
78. 10.1007/s40194-019-00714-310.1007/s40194-019-00714-3 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10477410.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104774 ↗
80. 10.1177/073168442199801710.1177/0731684421998017 ↗
81. 10.1108/RPJ-05-2022-015510.1108/RPJ-05-2022-0155 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.02010.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.020 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.13710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.12278010.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122780 ↗
85. 10.3390/polym1603040310.3390/polym16030403 ↗
86. 10.3390/polym1520412110.3390/polym15204121 ↗
87. 10.1080/25740881.2023.223446110.1080/25740881.2023.2234461 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.002 ↗
89. 10.1080/15397734.2019.159612710.1080/15397734.2019.1596127 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.01110.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.011 ↗
91. 10.1557/jmr.2019.29610.1557/jmr.2019.296 ↗
92. Nanya Li GL, Jelonnek J. Microwave printing temperature control of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 2019.
93. 10.3390/nano1301015010.3390/nano13010150 ↗
94. 10.1002/adem.20180062210.1002/adem.201800622 ↗
95. 10.3390/ma907058310.3390/ma9070583 ↗
96. 10.3390/polym1305072610.3390/polym13050726 ↗
97. 10.1002/pol.2023092610.1002/pol.20230926 ↗
98. 10.1080/00218464.2022.209364010.1080/00218464.2022.2093640 ↗
99. 10.1002/pc.2816110.1002/pc.28161 ↗
100. 10.3390/polym1206133410.3390/polym12061334 ↗