Modal and random vibration responses of composite overwrapped pressure vessels with various geodesic dome trajectories
Source abstract
Abstract
In the current study, Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPVs) with various geodesic dome profiles have been built and their modal and random vibration responses were numerically examined. In this regard, geodesic dome profiles were established for five different polar opening radii of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 mm, and thus the impacts of fibre orientations on vibration characteristics depending on the filament winding trajectories were discovered. Furthermore, non-prestressed modal and random vibration responses for COPVs, as well as prestressed vibration behaviours under 50, 100, and 150 Bar internal pressure, were investigated and thus the effects of internal pressure severity on dynamic characteristics were identified. The study found that higher polar opening radius triggered a reduction in the natural frequencies, and these reductions were linked to an increment in the filament winding angle, and a consequent deterioration in the structural stiffness of COPVs. On the other hand, raising the internal pressure severity shifts the natural frequencies to higher frequencies, which are also attributed to ascended structural stiffness. Furthermore, it was established that internal pressure severity and polar opening radius had a coupled effects on the modal and random responses, and that both parameters should be evaluated simultaneously.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Analysis and Optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Konya Technical University, Konya, Türkiye
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11485410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114854 ↗
2. Li M, Zhang P, Cui J, et al. Effect of hybridization on free vibration response of Carbon/Glass hybrid composite laminates. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2023; 07316844231197298.
3. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.07910.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.079 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.5372810.1002/app.53728 ↗
5. 10.3390/aerospace803006310.3390/aerospace8030063 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2666510.1002/pc.26665 ↗
7. 10.1177/073168441668972610.1177/0731684416689726 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1414387910.3390/ma14143879 ↗
9. 10.34118/jbms.v9i1.189510.34118/jbms.v9i1.1895 ↗
10. 10.1177/0731684422110528710.1177/07316844221105287 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11529610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115296 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.04110.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.041 ↗
13. Krishnasamy P, Mylsamy G, Jeyanthi S. Acoustic, vibration, and viscoelastic performance of wire EDM waste-reinforced natural fiber composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2023; 07316844231219316.
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11228210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112282 ↗
15. 10.1177/073168440505827210.1177/0731684405058272 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11446010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114460 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11025410.1016/j.tws.2022.110254 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11326210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113262 ↗
20. 10.1177/07316840302935810.1177/073168403029358 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.10403410.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.104034 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2009.12.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10346810.1016/j.est.2021.103468 ↗
24. Kumar SS, Kumari AS. Design and failure analysis of geodesic dome of a composite pressure vessel. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2012; 1(7).
25. 10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00044-610.1016/S0263-8223(99)00044-6 ↗
26. 10.1088/1757-899X/677/2/02206210.1088/1757-899X/677/2/022062 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.015 ↗
28. Zwillinger D. Clairaut’s equation, handbook of differential equations. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Academic Press, 1997, pp. 158–160. P.120.
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.27810.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.278 ↗
30. Corda S. In-flight vibration environment of the NASA F-15B flight test fixture. NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, 2002.
31. 10.1088/1757-899X/369/1/01203710.1088/1757-899X/369/1/012037 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11539510.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115395 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.051 ↗