journal article·2025-09Open access

Internal pressure testing of open-ended filament-wound cylinders using radial expansion of elastomeric inserts

Matheus Madrid, José Humberto S Almeida, Tales V Lisbôa, Axel Spickenheuer, Rogério J Marczak, Sandro C Amico

Abstract

A novel approach for generating internal pressure in filament-wound cylinders using the compressed elastomer method is investigated. Pressure is exerted on the inner surface of the cylinder by radially expanding elastomeric discs inside the composite cylindrical shell. This is accomplished by applying a uniaxial compressive load to the discs with the aid of rigs placed between compression platens in an ordinary universal testing machine. The digital image correlation (DIC) technique is employed to assist the tests in mapping both strain and displacement fields during the entire testing process. Cylinders with six different winding angles (±35°, ±45°, ±55°, ±65°, ±75°, and ±90°) are prepared and analysed. Their load-carrying capacity increases up to an angle of ±75°, accompanied by systematic changes in deformation and failure mechanisms. The suggested testing setup offers benefits in evaluating the impact of processing parameters on the internal pressure strength of filament-wound cylinders. It serves as a secure and cost-efficient laboratory-scale alternative to conventional hydrostatic pressure testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PROMEC, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

SENAI Institute of Innovation in Polymers Engineering, São Leopoldo, Brazil

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Department Materials Engineering, Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung, Dresden, Germany

Funding

Royal Academy of Engineering · CAPES/DAAD · FAPERGS · CNPq/EQUINOR

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/0731684423116854210.1177/07316844231168542 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11492910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114929 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.10693910.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106939 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.056 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.068 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11709-020-0650-310.1007/s11709-020-0650-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10895410.1016/j.tws.2022.108954 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10004510.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100045 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199831989914410.1177/0021998319899144 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1301003310.3390/polym13010033 ↗
11. 10.2514/1.542910.2514/1.5429 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00158-022-03227-810.1007/s00158-022-03227-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.00110.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.17810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11368610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113686 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0034-3617(14)70176-610.1016/S0034-3617(14)70176-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10051710.1016/j.coco.2020.100517 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11243210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112432 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.018 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11104110.1016/j.tws.2023.111041 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11633710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116337 ↗
24. 10.1177/0021998323116422110.1177/00219983231164221 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10443-017-9665-x10.1007/s10443-017-9665-x ↗
26. 10.1115/1.403250610.1115/1.4032506 ↗
27. 10.1016/0010-4361(84)90727-410.1016/0010-4361(84)90727-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.021 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.05910.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.059 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.005 ↗
31. 10.1177/002199831560761110.1177/0021998315607611 ↗
32. 10.1520/D2290-19A10.1520/D2290-19A ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11219910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112199 ↗
34. 10.1177/002199831244720910.1177/0021998312447209 ↗
35. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1982_196_014_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1982_196_014_02 ↗
36. 10.1520/C1819-2110.1520/C1819-21 ↗
37. 10.21236/ADA45721210.21236/ADA457212 ↗
38. 10.1520/JTE10423J10.1520/JTE10423J ↗
39. 10.1557/jmr.2009.015810.1557/jmr.2009.0158 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.00210.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.002 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.00110.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11449710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114497 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10922410.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109224 ↗
44. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10313-310.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10313-3 ↗
45. Kraus H. Thin elastic shells: an introduction to the theoretical foundations and the analysis of their static and dynamic behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1967.
46. Salem JA, et al. Burst testing of triaxial braided composite tubes, 2014. NASA/TM-2013-216615.
47. Scherer LG, Almeida JH, Azevedo CB, et al. Effect of geometry on physical and material properties of filament wound laminates. In: Proceedings of the 5th Brazilian conference on composite materials. Tita V, Tarpani JR, Ribeiro ML (eds). São Carlos: USP, 2021.
48. 10.1007/s40430-019-2083-210.1007/s40430-019-2083-2 ↗
49. 10.1002/pc.2554810.1002/pc.25548 ↗
50. 10.1098/rspa.2002.106610.1098/rspa.2002.1066 ↗
51. 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90513-X10.1016/0010-4361(78)90513-X ↗
52. 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90180-510.1016/0010-4361(78)90180-5 ↗
53. Cox BN, Flanagan G. Handbook of analytical methods for textile composites. Washington, DC: NASA, 1997.