journal article·2022-08

Strain rate-dependent crash simulation of woven glass fabric thermoplastic composites

Bilal Ahmad, Xiangfan Fang

Publisher page

Abstract

Woven fabric thermoplastic composites possess high specific strength and stiffness along with thermoformability. To utilize the full potential of these materials to achieve better crash-safe designs in automotive structural parts, their crash behavior must be predicted accurately. For reliable crash simulations, strain rate-dependent material data and equally capable material modeling are required. In this study, quasi-static and high-speed tests are carried out to measure tensile and in-plane shear properties. A strain rate-dependent continuum damage mechanics model is formulated to describe the deformation and damage behavior of woven glass fabric composites. Tensile and in-plane shear tests on a lab scale are used to calibrate the material parameters of the model. The model was implemented as a user-defined material subroutine (VUMAT) for Abaqus. Experimental results from coupon tests were used to verify the results of a single-element simulation. Finally, a structural level dynamic crash test of a u-profile on a drop tower was used to validate the predictions of the user material model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of SiegenGermany

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Oberhofer G · 2019
2. Coulton J · 2012
3. Maimí Vert P · 2006
4. Hack M, Farkas L, Liefooghe C, et al. Addressing automotive engineering challenges in composite development by simulation. NAFEMS Benchmark Magazine, http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/184940 (2015, accessed 21 Mar 2016).
5. Tabiei A · 2015
6. Zheng X. · 2006
7. Bruyneel M · 2015
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.08.006 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101266742757510.1023/A:1012667427575 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90097-M10.1016/0266-3538(92)90097-M ↗
11. 2015
12. Schweizerhof K · 1998
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0248626710.1007/BF02486267 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.029 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00186-X10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00186-X ↗
20. 2008
21. 10.1007/s10443-020-09844-010.1007/s10443-020-09844-0 ↗
22. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-010.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
24. 2020
25. 2016
26. 10.1007/s11340-014-9929-410.1007/s11340-014-9929-4 ↗
27. Fang XF · 2019
28. Fang XF · 2017
29. 10.12783/asc2017/1520110.12783/asc2017/15201 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.220826910.1063/1.2208269 ↗
31. 10.1007/s40870-016-0052-810.1007/s40870-016-0052-8 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.016 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1112201910.3390/polym11122019 ↗
34. 1997
35. 2021
36. 10.1016/0263-8223(91)90013-O10.1016/0263-8223(91)90013-O ↗
37. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-610.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-6 ↗
38. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00451.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00451.x ↗