Environmental effects on the bond at the interface of fiber-reinforced polymer and masonry brick
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examined the bond at the interface of masonry bricks and fiber-reinforced polymer when exposed to five environments. Three fabrics (aramid, carbon, and glass) and one type of epoxy resin were used. A total of 375 brick-fiber-reinforced polymer specimens were made using wet lay-up technic and exposed to chemical solutions at four pH values (2.5, 7, 10, and 12.5) and substitute seawater. The effect of dry heat on the bond at the interface was also investigated. Single-lap shear tests were then carried out on the samples after 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 13 weeks of exposure. The experimental results indicated that freshwater and seawater had a considerable effect on the bond strength of brick-aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) and brick-carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) samples; however, they did not significantly affect the bond strength of brick-glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP). Exposure to the severe environments was detrimental to bond strength. The results showed a significant loss of approximately 60% after 13 weeks of exposure to alkaline and acidic solutions. Dry heat did not significantly affect the bond strength of the tested samples.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Sharif University of Technology, Kish, Islamic Republic of Iran
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Toufigh V, Ouria A, Desai CS, et al. Interface behavior between carbon-fiber polymer and sand. J Test Eval 2015; 44: 385–390.10.1520/JTE20140153 ↗
2. Meier U · Struct Eng Int · 1992 · 22 · 710.2749/101686692780617020 ↗
3. Toufigh V, Desai CS, Saadatmanesh H, et al. Constitutive modeling and testing of the interface between backfill soil and fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP). Int J Geomech 2013; 14: 671–681.10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000298 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168440606514010.1177/0731684406065140 ↗
5. Qiao P and Xu Y. Effects of freeze–thaw and dry–wet conditionings on the mode-I fracture of FRP-concrete interface bonds. In: Engineering, construction and operations in challenging environments, pp.601–608.10.1061/40722(153)84 ↗
6. Toufigh V · Steel Compos Struct · 2013 · 14 · 4110.12989/scs.2013.14.1.041 ↗
7. Schutte CL · Mater Sci Eng R: Rep · 1994 · 13 · 26510.1016/0927-796X(94)90002-7 ↗
8. Saadatmanesh H · ACI Mater J · 2010 · 107 · 267
9. Ghiassi B · Compos Part B · 2013 · 54 · 1110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.074 ↗
10. Cromwell JR · Constr Build Mater · 2011 · 25 · 252510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.096 ↗
11. Abanilla M · Compos Part B · 2006 · 37 · 20010.1016/j.compositesb.2005.05.016 ↗
12. Sciolti MS · Compos Part B · 2012 · 43 · 323910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.002 ↗
13. Frigione M · J Mater Civil Eng · 2006 · 18 · 71510.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:5(715) ↗
14. ASTM D3039-07 · 2007
15. ASTM C1314-07 · 2007
16. UNI EN 1015-11. Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry. Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar, 2007.
17. ASTM C581-15 · 2015
18. ASTM D1141-98 · 2013
19. CNR-DT 200 · 2003
20. Karbhari VM · J Mater Sci · 1997 · 32 · 14710.1023/A:1018591619404 ↗
21. Karbhari VM · Compos Part A · 2009 · 40 · 135310.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.011 ↗