Impact of grain boundary character on grain rotation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The capillarity-driven shrinkage of isolated cylindrical grains with structurally different grain boundaries in aluminum was studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Three pairs of grains with 〈1 0 0〉 tilt and mixed tilt–twist boundaries with the misorientation angles θ0 = 5.45°, 16.26° and 22.61° were examined. The simulation results showed that the shrinkage of grains with pure tilt boundaries was accompanied by their rotation towards higher misorientation angles. On the contrary, grains with the mixed boundaries did not rotate significantly during their shrinkage. An analysis revealed that for the observed rotational behavior the grain boundary structure is crucial. In contrast to pure tilt boundaries composed of edge dislocations, for mixed tilt–twist boundaries, which are composed of intersecting dislocations with the mixed edge–screw character, the effective mechanisms of dislocation annihilation are available, which allow the respective grains to shrink without rotation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Margulies · Science · 2001 · 291 · 239210.1126/science.1057956 ↗
2. Haslam · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 209710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00011-9 ↗
3. Lin · Metall Mater Trans B · 2014 · 45 · 79510.1007/s11663-014-0049-4 ↗
4. Li · J Appl Phys · 1962 · 33 · 295810.1063/1.1728543 ↗
5. Moldovan · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 339710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00153-2 ↗
6. Harris · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 262310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00467-9 ↗
7. Klinger · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 669110.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.026 ↗
8. Bachurin · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 706410.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.014 ↗
9. Ashkenazy · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 20540910.1103/PhysRevB.64.205409 ↗
10. Haslam · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 318 · 29310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01266-7 ↗
11. Upmanyu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 170710.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.036 ↗
12. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 488710.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.048 ↗
13. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
14. Cahn · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 396510.1080/14786430500536909 ↗
15. Ivanov · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 78 · 06410610.1103/PhysRevB.78.064106 ↗
16. Caillard · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 239010.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.023 ↗
17. Mompiou · Acta Mater · 2009 · 58 · 367610.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.003 ↗
18. Khater · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 200710.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.001 ↗
19. Rajabzadeh · Phys Rev Lett · 2013 · 110 · 26550710.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265507 ↗
20. Taupin · Int J Plast · 2014 · 53 · 17910.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.002 ↗
21. Molodov · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 184310.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.045 ↗
22. Molodov · Mater Sci Forum · 2007 · 558–559 · 92710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.558-559.927 ↗
23. Gorkaya · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 539610.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.036 ↗
24. Gorkaya · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 63310.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.05.040 ↗
25. Molodov · J Mater Sci · 2011 · 46 · 431810.1007/s10853-010-5233-6 ↗
26. Molodov · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 99010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.030 ↗
27. Rajabzadeh · Philos Mag · 2013 · 93 · 129910.1080/14786435.2012.760760 ↗
28. Gorkaya · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 567410.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.042 ↗
29. Srinivasan · 2002 · 3
30. Trautt · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 240710.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.008 ↗
31. Trautt · Acta Mater · 2014 · 65 · 1910.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.059 ↗
32. Wu · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 40710.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.035 ↗
33. Mompiou · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 220910.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.013 ↗
34. Babcock · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 236710.1016/0001-6160(89)90034-5 ↗
35. Radetic · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 705110.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.012 ↗
36. Brandenburg · Scripta Mater · 2013 · 68 · 98010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.054 ↗
37. Brandenburg · Acta Mater · 2014 · 77 · 29410.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.006 ↗
38. Plimpton · Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
39. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 62 · 856410.1103/PhysRevB.62.8564 ↗
40. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 18410210.1103/PhysRevB.64.184102 ↗
41. Lee · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 14411210.1103/PhysRevB.68.144112 ↗
42. Janssens · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 12410.1038/nmat1559 ↗
43. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
44. Kirch · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 499810.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.017 ↗
45. Rath · Trans Metall Soc AIME · 1969 · 245 · 1577
46. Molodov · Scripta Metall Mater · 1995 · 32 · 52910.1016/0956-716X(95)90832-5 ↗
47. Gottstein · J Phys IV · 1995 · 5 · 89
48. Molodov · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 55310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00277-2 ↗
49. Ivanov · Mater Sci Forum · 2004 · 467–470 · 75110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.751 ↗
50. Ivanov · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 96910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.031 ↗
51. Günster · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 236310.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.007 ↗