Application of SRP Composite Sheets for Retrofitting Reinforced Concrete Beams: Cracking and Tension Stiffening
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the contribution of steel-reinforced polymer (SRP) composites to the serviceability of reinforced concrete beams when retrofitted, with particular emphasis on cracking behavior and tension stiffening. SRP composite sheets, consisting of high-carbon steel unidirectional fabrics embedded in epoxy resin, provide high tensile strength and modulus at a reasonable cost. Six reinforced concrete beams, five of which are retrofitted using various widths of SRP sheets with or without end anchorage, are tested in three-point bending to examine their flexural performance, including crack width and depth progression, crack patterns, flexural rigidity, and tension stiffening. A 3D non-linear finite element analysis is conducted and compared to the code provisions and experimental findings. The trend of crack width progression of the SRP-retrofitted beams includes an almost linear response with respect to the SRP strain development. Clear differences in crack spacing are observed between the mid-span and shear-span regions of the test beams. The end anchorage significantly improves flexural rigidity and narrows the crack spacing of SRP-retrofitted beams. A characteristic area, including the tension stiffening factor, is proposed to evaluate the contribution of SRP composites to the flexural rigidity of SRP-retrofitted beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA,
Department of Civil Engineering, Queen's University, Canada
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Asce · 2005
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73) ↗
3. Prentice, D. · 2004
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.15110.1016/j.msea.2005.08.151 ↗
5. Casadei, P. · ACI-SP · 2005 · 230 · 763
6. Kim, Y.J. · ACI-SP · 2005 · 230 · 1647
7. Minnaugh, P.L. · 2006
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.09.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2006.09.003 ↗
9. Hardwire. · 2004
10. 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00080-510.1016/S1359-8368(03)00080-5 ↗
11. Wobbe, E. · 2004
12. Figeys, W. · ACI-SP · 2005 · 230 · 743
13. Matana, M.
14. El-Hacha, R.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(752)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(752) ↗
16. Branson, D. · HPR Report No · 1965
17. ACI · 2008
18. ACI · ACI Committee · 2008 · 440
19. Ansys · 2004
20. CSA · 2006
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(619)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:6(619) ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(366)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2008)12:4(366) ↗
23. Kim, Y.J. · Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2010
24. Baker, A.L.L. · 1956