Improved uniform degree of multi-layer interlaminar bonding strength for composite laminate
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to their high strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios, composite materials are widely used in the aerospace industry. As a key factor for the placement process, the compaction force directly affects the product performance by changing the interlaminar bonding strength. Besides the magnitude of the interlaminar bonding strength, the uniformity degree of the bonding strength for each contact interface also affects the overall structural rigidity of laminates. This study is aimed at analyzing and optimizing the compaction force when using a rubber roller to produce a composite product with uniform interlaminar bonding strength. The amount in which the compaction force from a rubber roller on the current layer influences the bonding strength of the layers underneath is investigated, and methods for optimizing the interlaminar bonding strength are developed and experimentally demonstrated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing Technology, Ministry of Education, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Robotics and Mechatronics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Funding
China Scholarship Council · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Australian Research Council
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168441246784210.1177/0731684412467842 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.00810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.008 ↗
3. Griffiths B. Boeing sets pace for composite usage in large civil aircraft. High Perform Compos 2005; 13: 68–71.
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.018 ↗
5. 10.1108/0143991061065142810.1108/01439910610651428 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.001 ↗
7. He X · Adv Fuzzy Syst · 2016 · 1 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.rcim.2006.04.00610.1016/j.rcim.2006.04.006 ↗
9. 10.1177/073168441455706010.1177/0731684414557060 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.003 ↗
11. 10.1177/073168441665954410.1177/0731684416659544 ↗
12. Grimshaw MN, Grant CG and Diaz JML. Advanced technology tape laying for affordable manufacturing of large composite structures. In: International sampe symposium and exhibition . Citeseer, 2001.
13. 10.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.00210.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.00710.1016/j.rcim.2013.10.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00050-410.1016/S0736-5845(03)00050-4 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.019 ↗
17. 10.1177/002199830606016210.1177/0021998306060162 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00170-010-3028-110.1007/s00170-010-3028-1 ↗
19. Bendemra HV, MJ Compston, P. Optimisation of compaction force for automated fibre placement. In: Australasian congress on applied mechanics , Melbourne, 2014.
20. 10.1108/0144515001035324210.1108/01445150010353242 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983970310030210.1177/002199839703100302 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168441245193710.1177/0731684412451937 ↗
23. 10.1177/00219983870210020710.1177/002199838702100207 ↗
24. 10.1002/adv.2017710.1002/adv.20177 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00083-010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00083-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00166-410.1016/S1359-835X(00)00166-4 ↗
27. 10.1177/00219983870210110310.1177/002199838702101103 ↗
28. 10.1177/08927057970100060410.1177/089270579701000604 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983920260160210.1177/002199839202601602 ↗