The Fracture Behavior of Glass Fiber/Recycled PET Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The potential offered by glass fiber reinforced composite materials based on a recycled PET matrix has been investigated. Laminates containing both woven glass fabrics and chopped strand mats have been manufactured and tested under both quasi-static and impact conditions. Polished sections from a number of laminates have highlighted the high degree of fiber wetting and the low level of voiding in the laminates. Three point bend tests and Charpy impact tests on simple beam-like samples have shown that recycled polymer composites offer a range of mechanical properties similar to those associated with corresponding laminates based on virgin polymer matrices. A series of interlaminar fracture tests on the woven fiber composites have shown that the delamination resistance of these materials is comparable to that exhibited by relatively tough systems such as carbon fiber reinforced PEEK.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. V. Matthews · Plastics, Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications · 1993 · 19 · 197
2. P. Davies · 1991 · 70
3. 10.1177/00219983870210060710.1177/002199838702100607 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00084-X10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00084-X ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0036634210.1007/BF00366342 ↗
6. 10.1177/08927057880010010710.1177/089270578800100107 ↗
7. 7. R. van Daele, I. Verpoest and P. de Meester, Proc. ECCM3, Eds. A. R. Bunsell, P. Lamicq and A. Massiah, Elsevier App. Sci. 1989, pp493-498.
8. 8. T.J. Chapman, A.J. Smiley and R.B. Pipes, Proc. ICCM6/ECCM2 Eds. F.L. Matthews, N.C.R. Buskell, J.M. Hodgkinson and J. Morton, 1987, 3.295-3.304.
9. 9. K.T. Teh, J. Morton, J.P. de Souza and D.G. Baird, Proc. ICCM9, Ed. A. Miravete, Woodhead Publ. 1993,pp475-482.
10. 10.1016/0010-4361(92)90184-V10.1016/0010-4361(92)90184-V ↗
11. 10.1177/00219983960300110510.1177/002199839603001105 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983880220050210.1177/002199838802200502 ↗
13. C. Gautier · Plastics, Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications · 1993 · 20 · 77
14. 1996
15. A.J. Russell · 1985 · 349
16. 10.1002/pen.76027110510.1002/pen.760271105 ↗
17. 10.1016/B978-0-08-024766-3.50012-410.1016/B978-0-08-024766-3.50012-4 ↗
18. J.K. Wells · 1982 · 47
19. 10.1016/0266-3538(85)90049-110.1016/0266-3538(85)90049-1 ↗
20. 20. J.E. Masters, Proc. ICCM6/ECCM2, Eds. F.L. Matthews, N.C.R. Buskell, J.M. Hodgkinson and J. Morton, 1987, Elsevier App. Sci. 1987, p3.96-3.96.
21. 21. P. Davies, W. Cantwell, H. Richard, C. Moulin and H.H. Kausch, Proc. 3rd European Conference on Composite Materials ECCM3, Elsevier Applied Science, 1989, pp747-755.10.1007/978-94-009-1123-9_102 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-94-011-0707-510.1007/978-94-011-0707-5 ↗