Inelastic and Failure Analysis of Laminate Structures by ABAQUS Incorporated with a General Constitutive Relationship
Source abstract
Abstract
A general constitutive relationship for describing the inelastic and strength behavior of laminated composites reinforced with various fiber preforms was presented in References [1,2]. The relationship is consistent in that when the fiber disappears or becomes the same as the matrix, the nonlinear constitutive equations of the resulting composite deteriorate to those of the isotropic matrix material. One of the best benefits of the constitutive relationship is that all the formulas involved are in explicit form and only the properties of the constituent fiber and matrix of the composite are required as input material data. This will significantly simplify a finite element analysis for a laminated structure. In the present paper, the general constitutive relationship for tape laminates was programmed into a user subroutine, UGENS, of the commercial finite element (FE) software ABAQUS. Several laminated structures including a complicated bone plate were then analyzed, and good correlation between the numerical results and available experimental data was found. A list of the original computer code together with an input data file was summarized in the appendixes of the paper.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road Shanghai 200092, PR China,
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00074-310.1016/S0045-7949(02)00074-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00075-510.1016/S0045-7949(02)00075-5 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00142-110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00142-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00220-310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00220-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-810.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00226-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00226-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00125-210.1016/S0266-3538(02)00125-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00227-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00227-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00217-310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00217-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-610.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00218-510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00218-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00139-X10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00139-X ↗
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00219-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00219-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00145-510.1016/S0266-3538(96)00145-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00143-110.1016/S0266-3538(96)00143-1 ↗
16. 10.1177/00219983730070040410.1177/002199837300700404 ↗
17. Tsai, S.W. · 1980
18. 10.1016/S0167-6636(03)00011-510.1016/S0167-6636(03)00011-5 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219980276140528610.1177/002199802761405286 ↗
20. Zienkiewicz, O.C. · 1989
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-510.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5 ↗
22. Szycher, M. (1983). Biocompatible Polymers, Methods, and Composites , Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., 873—882.
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00219-110.1016/S0266-3538(02)00219-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.006 ↗