Influence of Water Absorption and Pre-drying Conditions on the Tensile Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Lignocellulosic Fiber/Polyester Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well known that humidity can deleteriously affect composite mechanical properties. In the present study the tensile properties of hybrid jute/cotton and sisal/cotton fabrics— polyester matrix composites were analyzed as a function of fiber content, immersion time in distilled water and of fabric drying just prior to composite manufacture. The results indicate that, as expected, tensile properties increase with fiber content, and that sisal reinforced composites were slightly more affected by water exposure than jute reinforced ones. This behavior was attributed to the higher affinity of sisal fibers toward water absorption. Fabric drying immediately before their incorporation onto the composites was shown to play an important role on composite mechanical properties. Fabric pre-drying led to composites with lower water absorption and higher overall mechanical properties. These composites also displayed a smaller strain at rupture, evincing better fiber to polymer matrix interaction. The data obtained suggests that water acts as a plasticizer for the systems investigated and that plasticization occurred in the early stages of composite immersion in water.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Department, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Av. Aprígio Veloso, 882 Bodocongó, 58109-970 Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
Materials Science and Metallurgy Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, 225 Gávea, 22453-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil,
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/174328907X19139610.1179/174328907X191396 ↗
2. 10.1080/0360255950800959910.1080/03602559508009599 ↗
3. Li, Y. · Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 60 · 2037
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960222)59:8<1329::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960222)59:8<1329::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
5. Pal, P.K. · Rubber. Compos. Process. Appl. · 1984 · 4 · 215
6. 10.1007/BF0055239310.1007/BF00552393 ↗
7. 10.1080/0360255990935163210.1080/03602559909351632 ↗
8. Semsarzadeh, M.A. · Eng. Sci. · 1985 · 25 · 618
9. 10.1002/app.1989.07037121410.1002/app.1989.070371214 ↗
10. d’Almeida, A.L.F.S. · Polym. Polym. Comp. · 2006 · 14 · 73
11. 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v3n3p367-37910.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v3n3p367-379 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168440404114710.1177/0731684404041147 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-005-2189-z10.1007/s10853-005-2189-z ↗
14. Mattoso, L.H.C. , Ferrreira, F.C. and Curvelo, A.A.S. (1997). In: Leão, A. L., Carvalho, F. X. and Frollini, E. (eds.), Lignocellulosic-Plastics Composites, pp. 241-266, Unesp Publisher, Botucatu - São Paulo, Brazil.
15. 10.1081/PPT-20003017910.1081/PPT-200030179 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00071-010.1016/S0142-9418(03)00071-0 ↗
17. Ledzki, A.K. · Polym. Sci. · 1999 · 24 · 221
18. 10.1007/BF0055206110.1007/BF00552061 ↗