journal article·2012-03

Evaluation of skin-core adhesion bond of out-of-autoclave honeycomb sandwich structures

R.R. Butukuri, V.P. Bheemreddy, K. Chandrashekhara, T.R. Berkel, K. Rupel

Publisher page

Abstract

Composite sandwich structures offer several advantages over conventional structural materials such as lightweight, high bending and torsional stiffness, superior thermal insulation and excellent acoustic damping. One failure mechanism in a composite sandwich structure is the debonding of the composite facesheets from the core structure. A well-formed adhesive fillet at the interface of the honeycomb core cell walls and the laminate is a significant factor in preventing bond failure. In the present work, honeycomb composite sandwich panels are manufactured using a low-cost vacuum-bag-pressure-only out-of-autoclave manufacturing process. CYCOM ® 5320 out-of autoclave prepreg is used for the facesheet laminates and FM ® 300-2U film adhesive is used for the facesheet-to-core bond. The manufactured composite sandwich panels are of aerospace quality with a facesheet laminate void content of around 1%. In this study, adhesive fillet formation and adhesive mechanical strength are evaluated as a function of several different sandwich construction design variables. Both aluminum and aramid Nomex ® honeycomb core materials are considered to study the effect of core cell size and core material. The effect of film adhesive thickness is studied. A process for reticulation of the adhesive is applied and studied. A quantitative investigation of the adhesive fillet geometry is carried out for all the panels. Manufactured panels are evaluated for flatwise tensile strength in accordance with test method ASTM C297. Optimized combinations of core material, core density, cell size and adhesive thickness are identified. Results show that the reticulation process improves fillet formation and increases flatwise tensile properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA.

Boeing Research & Technology, St. Louis, MO, USA.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.022 ↗
2. MentaV.G.K. VuppalapatiR.R. and ChandrashekharaK.. Evaluation of honeycomb composite sandwich structures manufactured using VARTM process. In: SAMPE International Symposium Seattle WA 2010 pp 1–11.
3. BitzerT.. Honeycomb technology: materials, design, manufacturing, applications and testing. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1998.
4. HouT.H. BaughmanJ.M. ZimmermanT.J. Evaluation of sandwich structure bonding in out-of-autoclave processing. In: SAMPE Technical Conference Salt Lake City UT 2010 pp. 1–12.
5. 10.1007/s10443-008-9056-410.1007/s10443-008-9056-4 ↗
6. GrimesG.C.. The adhesive honeycomb relationship. In: Applied Polymer Symposium 3 1996 pp 157–190.
7. 10.1177/09673911100180040110.1177/096739111001800401 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00099-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00099-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.07.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nima.2005.01.01010.1016/j.nima.2005.01.010 ↗
12. RionJ. LeterrierY. and MansonJ.E.. Ultralight composite sandwich structure: optimization of skin to honeycomb core bonding. In: 27th International Conference of SAMPE Paris Europe 2006 pp. 1–12.
13. 10.1520/C0297_C0297M-04R1010.1520/C0297_C0297M-04R10 ↗
14. 10.1520/D0792-0810.1520/D0792-08 ↗
15. 10.1520/D3171-1110.1520/D3171-11 ↗
16. WilsonP.H.. The Boeing Company “Apparatus for Reticulating an Adhesive to Conform to a Surface of an Aperture Work Piece. Patent 4155800 USA 1979.