Repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete columns with CFRPs
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, seismic retrofitting of undamaged and moderately damaged RC columns with CFRP was investigated. The experimental program was conducted on five RC columns with inadequate tie spacing, 90-degree hooks at tie ends, and plain (undeformed) reinforcing bars. Columns were tested under a constant axial load of 27% of axial capacity and under reversed lateral cyclic loading. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the influence of sustained axial load during repairing, damage, and corner-rounding radius of CFRP wraps on the seismic performance of RC columns. Improved performance in terms of ductility, dissipated energy, and secant-stiffness degradation was observed for the CFRP strengthened columns. Reducing the corner-rounding radius deteriorated the seismic behavior of the columns, while the stiffness degradation response remained unaffected. The sustained axial load during repairing had only minor effect on column behavior. After CFRP repairing, the increase in yield drift ratio and curvature was observed to be in proportion with the corresponding consumed ductility values during damage cycles. A drift-based design equation for FRP repaired columns was proposed that considers the damage amount and axial load level as the major parameters as consistent with the experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
Department of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey,
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Bett BJ · ACI Struct J · 1988 · 85 · 499
2. Ersoy U. · ACI Struct J · 1993 · 90 · 288
3. 10.1002/pse.14010.1002/pse.140 ↗
4. 10.1002/pse.21510.1002/pse.215 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.019 ↗
6. Chai YH · ACI Struct J · 1991 · 88 · 572
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199809)7:3<251::AID-TAL112>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199809)7:3<251::AID-TAL112>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
8. Saadatmanesh H. · ACI Struct J · 1994 · 91 · 434
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52) ↗
10. Saadatmanesh H. · ACI Struct J · 1997 · 94 · 206
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1357)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1357) ↗
12. Sheikh SA · ACI Struct J · 2002 · 99 · 72
13. Iacobucci RD · ACI Struct J · 2003 · 100 · 785
14. Sause R. · ACI Struct J · 2004 · 101 · 708
15. Bousias SN · ACI Struct J · 2004 · 101 · 512
16. Harajli MH · ACI Struct J · 2004 · 101 · 47
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(741)10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(741) ↗
18. Elsanadedy HM · ACI Struct J · 2005 · 102 · 505
19. Yalcin C. · Constr Build Mater · 2006 · 8 · 295
20. Ghosh KK · ACI Struct J · 2007 · 104 · 227
21. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.02110.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.021 ↗
23. Yau G. · 1998