journal article·2004-03

Study on the Molding Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Injection-molded Foaming Polypropylene Parts

Rean Der Chien, Shia-Chung Chen, Ping-Hui Lee, Jien-Sheng Huang

Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the molding characteristics and mechanical properties of injection-molded foaming polypropylene (PP) parts and coinjection-molding PP parts for foaming core material embedded in nonfoaming skin material. Effects of processing parameters including injection-velocity, melting temperature, mold temperature and back pressure on part weight and part mechanical properties including tensile strength, flexural strength and stiffness are investigated. Influence of part thickness and foaming agent content on the degree of foaming is also studied. Based on the measured results, it was found that for thin-wall tensile foam specimens with 0.5 mm thickness, weight reduction is about 4–9% whereas in the thick-wall bending foam specimens with 15 mm thickness, the reduction is approximately 43–50%. Part thickness is a dominant factor to determine the degree of foaming. For injection-molded foaming parts, part weight, tensile strength, flexural strength and stiffness decrease with increasing melt temperature, mold temperature and injection velocity, whereas they increase with increasing back pressure. Foaming results in weight reduction but it also reduces part mechanical properties. The foaming agent content increases from 0.8 to 1.6%, the mechanical properties reduces significantly. Moreover, the coinjection-molding thin-wall parts process for foaming core material embedded in nonfoaming skin material results in a foam part with very good esthetics and higher tensile strength than injection-molded foaming parts. Meanwhile, the foam core is well bonding to the nonfoam skin in the coinjection-molding parts. The present investigation provides a molding guideline for injection-molded foaming parts and coinjection-molding parts to achieve a specific objective of part quality.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Injection Molding Process and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department Nanya Institute of Technology Chung-Li, Taiwan 32024, ROC

Mechanical Engineering Department Chung Yuan University Chung-Li, Taiwan 32023, ROC

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Technical Bulletin SFR-28B, Engineering Structural Foam, General Electric Plastics, Pittsfield, MA 01201.
2. 2. Semerdjiev, S. (1982). Introduction to Structural Foam, Society of Plastics Engineers, Brookfield, CT .
3. 3. Johnson, R. (1985). Plastics Design Forum, 10: 94 .10.1016/0026-0800(85)90039-4 ↗
4. 4. Grelle, P.F. and Carpenter, K.J. (1991). Structural Foam Polystyrene: An Evaluation of Process Foam Agents and Paintability, ANTEC, p. 1324.
5. 5. Philip, M. and Jaocobs, (1985). Endothermic Blowing Agents and Structure Foam Quality , In: Proceedings of 12th Annual Structural Foam Conference and Parts Competition.
6. 6. Anonymous. (1982). Plastics Design Forum, 7: 73 .
7. 7. Malloy, R., Kadkol, P. and Hornberger, L. (1992). SPI Structural Plastics Conference, p. 191 .
8. 8. Peach, N. (1976). Plastics Design Forum, 1: 36 .
9. 9. Ysseldyke, D., Nimmer, R. and Wstokes, V. (1986). Annual SPI Structural Foam Conference, p. 133 .
10. 10. Anonymous, (1976). Plastics Design Forum, 1: 36 .10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.996.3 ↗
11. 11. Farrah, M. and Barone, D. (1982). Plastics Design Forum, 7: 59 .
12. 12. Eckardt, H. (1986). How to Develop a Sucessful Conjection Application , 14th Annual Structural Foam Conference, Society of Plastics Industry, April, Boston, p. 22 .
13. 13. Turner, N. and Koski, G. (1980). Plastics Design Forum, 5: 60 .10.1016/0029-5493(80)90308-8 ↗
14. 14. McRoskey, J. (1992). Annual SPI Structural Plastics Conference, p. 120 .
15. 10.1002/pen.76030201110.1002/pen.760302011 ↗
16. 16. Theberge, J. (1991). Plastics Design Forum, 47: 27 .10.1177/0021955X9102700155 ↗
17. 17. Anonymous, (1981). Plastics Design Forum, 6: 61 .
18. 18. Escale, (1970). The ICI Sandwich Molding Process , Kunststoffe, 60: 847 .
19. 19. Eckardt, (1985). One-Step Production Screened Housing with Good Surface Quality Made Possible by Two-Component Injection Molding , Kunststoffe, 75: 145 .
20. 10.1002/pen.76015070210.1002/pen.760150702 ↗
21. 21. Young, S. (1980). A Basic Experimental Study of Sandwich Injection with Sequential Injection , Polym. Eng. Sci., p. 789 .10.1002/pen.760201206 ↗
22. 22. Turng, S. and Wang, V.W. (1991). Simulation of Co-injection and Gas-assisted Injection Molding , SPE Tech. Paper, 37: 179 .
23. 23. Chen, S.C., Hsu, K.F. and Jong, W.R. (1994). Study of the Polymer Melt Flow During Injection Molding Using Coinjection Molding Technique , SPE Tech. Paper.10.1016/0735-1933(94)90049-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/0735-1933(94)90049-310.1016/0735-1933(94)90049-3 ↗
25. 25. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, (1978). Philadelphia, PA .
26. 26. Gere, J.M. and Timoshenko, S.P. (1995). Mechanics of Materials, p. 471, 3rd Edn., Wadsworth International, MA .