journal article·2026-01-23Open access

Enhancing energy absorption of luffa–cenosphere-reinforced epoxy composite: Influence of surface modification of reinforcements

Ashish Kumar Gurjar, Satyabodh M. Kulkarni, Sharnappa Joladarashi, Saleemsab Doddamani, Mohan Kumar TS

Abstract

This study focuses on the development and impact performance of lightweight hybrid composites (LCE) reinforced with luffa fibers and cenospheres. Luffa fibers underwent surface modifications using acetic acid, benzoyl chloride, and potassium permanganate, while cenospheres were chemically treated with a silane agent 3-triethoxysilyl-propylamine (T-TESPA) to improve their compatibility with the epoxy matrix. The L16 array was created according to Taguchi’s DOE, and the LCE composite was fabricated accordingly. Microstructural analysis confirmed that the fibers and fillers were evenly distributed within the matrix. FTIR and TGA results showed that the treatments enhanced chemical functionality, thermal stability, and interfacial bonding of reinforcement with matrix. Impact testing revealed that the composites exhibited clear patterns of damage initiation and peak load capacity. Among all tested samples, LCE08—made with benzoyl chloride–treated fibers, T-TESPA-modified cenospheres at 20% filler volume, and one fiber layer—showed the best performance, achieving the highest peak force (1103.44 N), the lowest coefficient of restitution, and the most significant energy absorption, 37% higher than the untreated baseline LCE01. Based on the findings from the tested samples, the optimized parameters for the LCE composite—as determined through Taguchi’s DOE—were identified as benzoyl chloride–treated luffa fibers, a 20% filler volume, T-TESPA-modified cenospheres, and the inclusion of two fiber layers, resulting in superior energy absorption. Fractographic studies confirmed improved crack deflection, energy dissipation, and interfacial adhesion. This work demonstrates that combining natural fibers and modified fillers with optimized processing significantly enhances the mechanical performance, energy absorption, and impact resistance of lightweight composites. These materials show great promise for advanced structural applications requiring high durability and energy dissipation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Technology Karnataka

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/9781118911068.ch1010.1002/9781118911068.ch10 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12633710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126337 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.07710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.077 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11195010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111950 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12221-025-01209-310.1007/s12221-025-01209-3 ↗
7. Célino A, Fréour S, Jacquemin F, et al. The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: a review. Front Chem 2014; 1(JAN): 1–12.10.3389/fchem.2013.00043 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10084910.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100849 ↗
9. Oladimeji O, Olujoba M, Kanayo K. Ballistic and impact resistance performance of natural fiber-reinforced composites from biomass resources. Next Mater 2025; 8(February): 100565.10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100565 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.01.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.01.003 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10068-013-0142-510.1007/s10068-013-0142-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.07010.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.08.070 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00253-002-1119-010.1007/s00253-002-1119-0 ↗
14. 10.15376/biores.5.2.727-74010.15376/biores.5.2.727-740 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.13310.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.133 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.004 ↗
17. 10.15376/biores.8.2.1709-171710.15376/biores.8.2.1709-1717 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10749610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107496 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10653810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106538 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.08210.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.082 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.95610.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.956 ↗
22. 10.1016/B978-0-323-90125-3.00006-910.1016/B978-0-323-90125-3.00006-9 ↗
23. Koruk H, Genc G, Yuce H. Jute and luffa fibers: physical, acoustical, and mechanical properties. Elsevier Ltd., 2023.
24. 10.1002/app.3474410.1002/app.34744 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.07910.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.079 ↗
26. 10.1177/002199831561565410.1177/0021998315615654 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00008-910.1016/S0142-9418(02)00008-9 ↗
28. 10.1080/0021846021038310.1080/00218460210383 ↗
29. 10.1002/1097-4660(200101)76:1<9::AID-JCTB335>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1097-4660(200101)76:1<9::AID-JCTB335>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
30. 10.1002/pi.105510.1002/pi.1055 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13549310.1016/j.matlet.2023.135493 ↗
32. 10.1039/D4RA06223J10.1039/D4RA06223J ↗
33. 10.1023/A:102064841823310.1023/A:1020648418233 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.1150110.1002/app.11501 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.080 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.025 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11119010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111190 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.08310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.083 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.01710.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.05.017 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.020 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12008-022-01061-210.1007/s12008-022-01061-2 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.04510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.045 ↗
43. 10.1007/s12008-022-01061-210.1007/s12008-022-01061-2 ↗
44. Dhummansure V, Kalyanrao AA, Doddamani S. Optimization of process parameters for fracture toughness of Al6061-graphite composites. Struct Integr Life 2020; 20(1): 51–55.
45. 10.1007/s12666-020-02113-510.1007/s12666-020-02113-5 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.01110.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.011 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10834010.1016/j.measurement.2020.108340 ↗
48. 10.1002/pc.2838510.1002/pc.28385 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-020-05432-610.1007/s10853-020-05432-6 ↗
50. Preetha MMP, Panicker S, Vigneshwaran LV. Review on LUFFA acutangula L.: ethnobotany, phytochemistry, nutritional value and pharmacological properties. AN Int J Pharm Sci 2019; 10(3): 152–159.
51. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960531)60:9<1483::AID-APP23>3.0.CO;2-110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960531)60:9<1483::AID-APP23>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
52. 10.1533/978184569505710.1533/9781845695057 ↗
53. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.801.5910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.801.59 ↗
54. Mohan Kumar TS, Sharnappa J, Kulkarni SM, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on low-velocity impact response of sandwich structure with functionally graded core. Poly Compos 2023; 45: 3225–3242.
55. 10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00178-210.1016/S1359-835X(04)00178-2 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.029 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.09.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.09.007 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.009 ↗
59. 10.1177/0892705722114553010.1177/08927057221145530 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.04.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.04.005 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.10.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.10.001 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00065-810.1016/S0020-7683(01)00065-8 ↗