Experimental study of interlayer properties of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites based on CNT reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, to address the common interlaminar cracking failure problem of continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (CCFRTP) laminates, the thermoplastic resin polyetherimide (PEI) was selected and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were introduced into the PEI matrix to improve the interlaminar properties. The experimental results show that when the content of CNTs in the resin matrix is 6 wt%, the interlayer performance of the laminates is the best, and the interlayer fracture toughness in the stable expansion stage of mode I crack is increased by 131.61%; mode II interlaminar fracture toughness was increased by 347.38%. This is attributable to the introduction of CNTs, which not only serve as a bridging agent at the resin–fiber interface to extend crack propagation pathways, but also enhance the adhesion between resin and fibers. Consequently, the interlaminar failure mode shifts to resin fracture within resin-rich zones, thereby substantially improving the interlaminar mechanical properties of the composite laminate. This provides a theoretical foundation for further enhancing the comprehensive performance of CCFRTP laminates in future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenyang Aerospace University
Funding
Key Research and Development Program of Liaoning Province of China
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s42823-022-00358-210.1007/s42823-022-00358-2 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.19710.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.197 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0274998210.1007/BF02749982 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10793210.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107932 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.022 ↗
6. 10.1080/09276440.2020.180216610.1080/09276440.2020.1802166 ↗
7. Xia S, Guo Q, Yu Y. Surface modification of carbon fibre cloth with graphene oxide through an electrophoresis method for lithium metal anode. Carbon: An International Journal Sponsored by the American Carbon Society. 2023; 203: 743–752.10.1016/j.carbon.2022.12.034 ↗
8. 10.1023/A:102510910351110.1023/A:1025109103511 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.08810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.088 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10359110.1016/j.surfin.2023.103591 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.06210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.062 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13210810.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132108 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2651010.1002/pc.26510 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.03610.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.036 ↗
16. 10.1177/0954008321105374210.1177/09540083211053742 ↗
17. Hu J, Yan F, Liu H, et al. Water-based PEKC-COOH sizing agent for enhancing the interfacial adhesion of carbon fibre/polyether-ether-ketone composites, composites, Part B. Engineering 2021; 225: 109279.
18. Kali D, Chauhan SR, Bharti G. Study on the effects of nano-aluminum-oxide particulates on mechanical and tribological characteristics of chopped carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design Applications. 2017; 231: 1–10.
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10927910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109279 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.042 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.05310.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.053 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.01710.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.12910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.129 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10048010.1016/j.coco.2020.100480 ↗
26. Wang J, Ma C, Chen G, et al. Interlaminar fracture toughness and conductivity of carbon fibre/epoxy j resin composite laminate modified by carbon black-loaded polypropylene i non-woven fabric interleaves. Compos Struct 2020; 234(Feb): 111649.1–111649.9.10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111649 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.030 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10809310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108093 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.08110.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.081 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10963910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109639 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.12101910.1016/j.seppur.2022.121019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10848710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108487 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2614410.1002/pc.26144 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.03510.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.035 ↗
35. 10.1021/la062743p10.1021/la062743p ↗
36. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13531210.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135312 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.03010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.030 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.01.009 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2753010.1002/pc.27530 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2457210.1002/pc.24572 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2015.06.018 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11630910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116309 ↗
44. 10.1016/0010-4361(94)90204-610.1016/0010-4361(94)90204-6 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11884910.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118849 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11721410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117214 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10205110.1016/j.coco.2024.102051 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.diamond.2022.10928510.1016/j.diamond.2022.109285 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10939110.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109391 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11750710.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117507 ↗
51. 10.1002/pc.2925610.1002/pc.29256 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11180810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111808 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.00910.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.009 ↗
54. 10.3390/nano812099610.3390/nano8120996 ↗