journal article·2025-11-07

Influence of print orientation on mechanical characteristics of FDM-printed OBE polymer

Kaviyarasan Kalaiyarasan, Soundararajan Ranganathan, Karthick Nagarajan, Rajeswari Balakrishnan

Publisher page

Abstract

The impact of print direction on mechanical characteristics of OBE (Olefin Block Elastomer) polymer fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is investigated in this study. OBE possesses characteristics of both a polymer and an elastomer, which depend on its specified orientation. With constant FDM process parameters, the OBE samples were fabricated with three directional orientation formations based on the X, Y, and Z axis directions, and their mechanical behaviour, such as tensile strength, Shore D hardness, flexural strength, and impact strength, was recorded. The results demonstrated that the orientation formation in the FDM technique significantly influenced the ductile characteristics of FDM-OBE materials. The improved filament arrangement and inter-layer formation of X-oriented specimens exhibit enhanced mechanical properties. In contrast, Z-oriented samples displayed the lowest performance, attributed to weaker inter-layer adhesion and higher susceptibility to delamination. Additionally, fractography analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was achieved to apprehend the failure mechanisms. The result shows that specimens printed in different orientations perform strong anisotropy in their mechanical properties. This emphasises that the printing strategies for FDM-printed parts are directly influenced by the printing orientation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Karpagam Institute of Technology

Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology

Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan College of Engineering

Government College of Engineering

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/089270572097062910.1177/0892705720970629 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1624766410.3390/ma16247664 ↗
3. Patel S Gupta S Saket H et al. Effect of infill pattern on the mechanical properties of PLA and ABS specimens prepared by FDM 3D printing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. DOI: 10.1177/09544089241258744 Epub ahead of print 11 June 2024.10.1177/09544089241258744 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 ↗
5. Soundararajan R Kaviyarasan K Sathishkumar A et al. Evaluating the impact of post-processing on the wear and friction properties of polyamide 6 carbon fiber composites produced by fused deposition modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. DOI: 10.1177/09544089241300001 Epub ahead of print 19 November 2024.10.1177/09544089241300001 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598-024-80376-410.1038/s41598-024-80376-4 ↗
7. Naveen Kumar C, Venkatesan S. A review on the fused deposition modelling of fibre-reinforced polymer composites: influence of process parameters, pre-processing and post processing techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 2024; 238: 2096–2119.
8. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-004210.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0042 ↗
9. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
10. Ziemian C Sharma M Ziemi S. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. In: Mechanical Engineering. InTech. Epub ahead of print 11 2012. DOI: 10.5772/34233.10.5772/34233 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.09510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.06510.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40033-023-00503-910.1007/s40033-023-00503-9 ↗
14. 10.1089/3dp.2015.003610.1089/3dp.2015.0036 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
18. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-011510.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0115 ↗
19. 10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-009110.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091 ↗
20. Karthick N Sathishkumar A Kaviyarasan K et al. Tribological analysis of annealed and laser-treated polyamide 6 reinforced with glass fibre composites fabricated by FDM technology. Lasers Manuf Mater Process. DOI: 10.1007/s40516-025-00309-5 Epub ahead of print 28 August 2025.10.1007/s40516-025-00309-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.00110.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 ↗
22. Sharvesh R Babu M Soundararajan R. Appraisal of mechanical and tribological behaviour of polyamide 6 with carbon fibre-filled composites fabricated through fused deposition modelling. J Inst Eng Ser. DOI: 10.1007/s40033-024-00735-3 Epub ahead of print 17 April 2024.10.1007/s40033-024-00735-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.04510.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.00410.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.004 ↗
25. 10.1108/1355254011039554710.1108/13552540110395547 ↗
26. 10.1002/pen.2715010.1002/pen.27150 ↗
27. Sharma P Sharma SP. Performance analysis of CFRP composite interface engineered with bioactive polymer‐supported ZnO nanoflakes coating for improved bending strength. Polym Compos. DOI: 10.1002/pc.70352 Epub ahead of print 27 August 2025.10.1002/pc.70352 ↗
28. Wang X Li X Li Z et al. Superior strength toughness and damage‐tolerance observed in microlattices of aperiodic unit cells. Small; 20. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202307369 Epub ahead of print 6 June 2024.10.1002/smll.202307369 ↗