journal article·2026-03Open access

Finite element analysis and design of connection strength of a segmented composite wind turbine blade

Baoning Chang, Pengfei Liu, Fang Zhou, Lijun Zhang, Shilun Ruan, Changyu Shen, Tong Yang

Abstract

Based on a fluid-solid coupling analysis of a 59.5 m full-scale blade, this paper proposes a scarf adhesive/embedded bolt sleeve hybrid connection configuration for a segmented composite blade. The segmentation occurs 18 m from the blade root. By incorporating aerodynamic loads calculated using the blade element momentum (BEM) theory, as well as gravity loads and stud preloads, finite element analysis (FEA) is performed using ABAQUS software to assess the stress, strain, displacement, and damage behaviors of the segmented blade under the wind speeds 10 m/s and 15 m/s. The bilinear cohesive model and finite-thickness cohesive elements in ABAQUS are employed to predict the adhesive layer’s damage behaviors. Numerical results reveal that: (1) except at the segmented location, the mechanical performance of the segmented blade closely mirrors that of the full-scale blade; (2) under the wind speeds 10 m/s and 15 m/s, initial adhesive failure occurs almost across the entire adhesive layer under low cohesive strength 5 MPa, although significant cohesive stiffness degradation does not occur; and (3) a mixed-mode fracture (open/shear) is evident under low cohesive strength 5 MPa, while shear fracture dominates under high cohesive strength 30 MPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beihang University

Dalian University of Technology

Zhejiang University

University of Science and Technology Beijing

Funding

Zhejiang Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project · National Open Project Funding for Major Scientific · National Natural Science Foundation of China · The Ningbo Key Research and Development Program · The Key Technology Research and Development Project of Beilun District · Opening Funding of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jweia.2023.10548410.1016/j.jweia.2023.105484 ↗
2. 10.2172/89743410.2172/897434 ↗
3. Dutton AG, Geiger T, Hahn F. Design concept for sectional wind turbine blades. European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC99) 1999: 285–288.
4. Dutton AG, Kildegaard C, Dobbe T. Design, structural testing, and cost effectiveness of sectional wind turbine blades. The European Commission report 2001.
5. 10.1177/0309524X21106939310.1177/0309524X211069393 ↗
6. 10.1002/we.12810.1002/we.128 ↗
7. Hald H, Kensche WC. Development and tests of a light-mass GRP rotor blade for the DFVLR 100kW WeC. Wind Power. 1985; 85(12): 506–512.
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.04010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.040 ↗
9. Vionis P, Lekou D, Gonzalez F, et al. Development of a MW scale wind turbine for high wind complex terrain sites. The Megawind project. EWEC, 2006.
10. Ganeriwala SN Richardson M. Modes indicate cracks in wind turbine blade. In: 29th IMAC conference Jacksonville Florida 2011.
11. Saldanha FA, Rao VV, ChristoPher J. Investigations on concepts for modularizing a horizontal axis wind turbine blade. ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2013: 980–989.
12. Bhat C, Noronha DJ, Saldana FA. Structural performance evaluation of segmented wind turbine blade through finite element simulation. Inter J Mech Aeros Indust Mecha Manuf Eng 2015; 9(6): 980–989.
13. 10.1002/we.170410.1002/we.1704 ↗
14. Abdulaziz AH, Elsabbagh AM, Akl WN. Dynamic and static characterization of horizontal axis wind turbine blades using dimensionless analysis of scaled-down models. Int J Renew Energy Resour 2015; 5: 404–418.
15. 10.3390/en1009140410.3390/en10091404 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.07310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.073 ↗
17. 10.3390/en1008111210.3390/en10081112 ↗
18. 10.1017/jmech.2016.12010.1017/jmech.2016.120 ↗
19. 10.15632/jtam-pl.57.1.8510.15632/jtam-pl.57.1.85 ↗
20. 10.1088/1742-6596/2265/3/03202310.1088/1742-6596/2265/3/032023 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11621210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116212 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.10376010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103760 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10785510.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107855 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11728910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117289 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10443-022-10098-110.1007/s10443-022-10098-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.028 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.404241410.1115/1.4042414 ↗
28. Zhang YC. Principles of steel structure design. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004, pp. 95–99.
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.01.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.01710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.017 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11258110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112581 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10226310.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102263 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11101610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111016 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10334710.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103347 ↗
35. 10.1177/073168441456522410.1177/0731684414565224 ↗