journal article·2025-09Open access

Tailoring the vibration characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid in fused filament fabrication process

N Vinoth Babu, N Venkateshwaran, S Panneer selvan

Abstract

The Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process has gained significant attention for its ability to manufacture parts using advanced polymeric materials, such as carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (CF-PLA). By adjusting the printing process parameters of the CF-PLA, the optimized mechanical properties can be achieved with less chances of flaws. Structural integrity of the components plays an important role in analyzing the durability of the product which can be analyzed using modal analysis. This research study focuses on analyzing the effect of process parameters on the vibration damping characteristics of CF-PLA components produced by the FFF process. The Taguchi method is used to model the relationship between process parameters and vibration performance metrics. Based on the vibration study, the optimal process parameters were determined as 60% infill density, 0.08 mm slice thickness, and hexagonal pattern. This study shows that the natural frequency and damping increases with increase in infill percent but decreases with increase in slice thickness. The closely aligned values between the predicted and experimental results suggest that the developed model is effective in predicting the vibration characteristics of CF-PLA composites. By accurately adjusting the process parameters, the study’s findings—such as frequencies and damping ratio—provide manufacturers with important and dependable CF-PLA Fused Deposition Modeling components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Excellence in Digital Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Thandalam, Chennai, TamilNadu, India

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00068-3 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.1011210.1002/pc.10112 ↗
5. 10.1080/1042691000891297610.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.00910.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.08310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.083 ↗
8. 10.1051/meca/202300310.1051/meca/2023003 ↗
9. Wang S, Ma Y, Deng Z, et al. Effects of fused deposition modeling process parameters on tensile, dynamic mechanical properties of 3D printed polylactic acid materials. Polym Test 2020; 86(34): 1–8.
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11066110.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110661 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.029 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11061710.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110617 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11060310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110603 ↗
15. Hung L, Denizhan Y, Dazhong W. Mechanical and fracture behavior of additively manufactured carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with bouligand meso-structures. Compos Struct 2023; 323(2138): 117436.
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10890310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108903 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11014410.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110144 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1505129910.3390/polym15051299 ↗
19. 10.3390/mi1304055310.3390/mi13040553 ↗
20. 10.23939/ujmems2021.01-02.00110.23939/ujmems2021.01-02.001 ↗
21. Adarsh S, Atul J. Microstructure and mechanical properties of filament and fused deposition modelling printed polylactic-acid and carbon-fiber reinforced polylactic-acid. J Reinforc Plast Compos 2023: 1–16.
22. 10.3390/jcs501002910.3390/jcs5010029 ↗
23. 10.26701/ems.88125410.26701/ems.881254 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1223385910.3390/ma12233859 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
26. Chaitanya SK, Reddy KM, Harsha SH. Vibration properties of 3D printed/rapid prototype parts. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2015; 4(6): 4602–4608.
27. Kesentini Z, El MA, Rebiere JL, et al. Effect of hydric aging on the static and vibration behavior of 3D printed bio-based flax fiber reinforced poly-lactic acid composites. Polym Polym Compos 2022; 30(5).
28. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6a4810.1088/2053-1591/ab6a48 ↗
29. 10.1108/RPJ-05-2020-011010.1108/RPJ-05-2020-0110 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.158249910.1115/1.1582499 ↗
31. 10.1177/0892705722109232710.1177/08927057221092327 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00170-019-04907-410.1007/s00170-019-04907-4 ↗
33. 10.1177/0892705722109498410.1177/08927057221094984 ↗
34. 10.1142/S0218625X2230002710.1142/S0218625X22300027 ↗
35. Umit C, Menderes K. A review study on mechanical properties of obtained products by FDM method and metal/polymer composite filament production. J Nanomater 2020; 6187149(9): 1–9.
36. 10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
37. Shivani SA, Ravindra A. Effect of infill density and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Mater Today 2022; 69(1): 804–807.
38. 10.3390/ma1613457410.3390/ma16134574 ↗
39. Jatti VS, Jatti SV, Patel PA. A study on effect of fused deposition modelling process parameters on mechanical properties. Int J Sci Technol Res 2019; 8(11): 689–693.
40. 10.1002/adem.20230165010.1002/adem.202301650 ↗
41. 10.1080/10667857.2021.191505610.1080/10667857.2021.1915056 ↗