Mechanical recycling of poly(lactic acid)/agave fiber biocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on evaluating the mechanical recycling potential of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biocomposites reinforced with agave fibers (AF). The biocomposites were prepared by extrusion using 5, 15, and 30 wt.% of agave fibers and reprocessed up to eight times. The results show that the fiber dimensions substantially decrease during reprocessing, especially after the first extrusion cycle, followed by a more gradual decrease in each subsequent cycle. The melt flow index (MFI) and the mechanical properties (except impact strength) tend to decrease as the fiber concentration increases. On the other hand, the glass transition temperature ( T g ) and the crystallinity ( X c ) of the biocomposites increased with increasing fiber concentration. It is important to highlight that closed-loop reprocessing does not significantly affect the overall behavior of the biocomposites under the conditions investigated. Therefore, PLA reinforced with AF is suitable for primary recycling since the final properties are mainly influenced by the fiber concentration and less by the number of reprocessing cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universidad de Guadalajara
Universite Laval
Greenprint – Actorsa
Funding
Mexican National Council of Science and Technology
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/15718093-1234137510.1163/15718093-12341375 ↗
2. European Parliament. Ley Europea del Clima. Off J Eur Union 2021; 64: 1–17. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2021:243:FULL&from=EN
3. ANIPAC. Nueva economía del plástico En México 2020. https://anipac.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/primer_informe_acuerdo_nacional.pdf
4. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11458-009-0092-x10.1007/s11458-009-0092-x ↗
6. 10.1007/s10924-016-0787-210.1007/s10924-016-0787-2 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10924-011-0343-z10.1007/s10924-011-0343-z ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.00410.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.4375010.1002/app.43750 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168441664750710.1177/0731684416647507 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.10610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.106 ↗
12. 10.1177/089270571243957110.1177/0892705712439571 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1011128610.3390/ma10111286 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0149892710.1007/BF01498927 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.01810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.018 ↗
16. 10.1002/app.4002310.1002/app.40023 ↗
17. 10.13031/2013.2210110.13031/2013.22101 ↗
18. 10.1177/009524431988471610.1177/0095244319884716 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.01.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.01.012 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10924-018-1308-210.1007/s10924-018-1308-2 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10924-017-1117-z10.1007/s10924-017-1117-z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.01910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.12.019 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12588-010-0010-610.1007/s12588-010-0010-6 ↗
24. 10.1002/adv.2192810.1002/adv.21928 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.03510.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.035 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.032 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1411311110.3390/ma14113111 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.12810.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.128 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1301021210.3390/ma13010212 ↗
32. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0699810.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06998 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.01010.1016/j.ibiod.2017.01.010 ↗
34. 10.1177/0021998321104769710.1177/00219983211047697 ↗
35. 10.1515/9783111067285-00210.1515/9783111067285-002 ↗