journal article·2023-10

Role of discontinuous fiber core material on the mechanical behavior of hybrid sandwich polyester composites

Richard Larson, Von C Jamora, Siavash Sattar, Sergii G Kravchenko, Oleksandr G Kravchenko

Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigated the potential for improving the mechanical behavior of glass fiber polyester composites by using symmetric hybrid sandwich configurations that combine continuous woven composite and different discontinuous reinforcements used as a core. The discontinuous reinforcements included sheet molding compound (SMC), bulk molding compound (BMC), and the discontinuous prepreg based platelets that were chopped from the woven trim scrap. Hybrid sandwich configurations using different core materials exhibited improvements in flexural mechanical properties, while providing more progressive failure under both flexural and compressive loading. Compressive strength in polyester SMC and woven laminate was significantly lower than flexural strength, while BMC and chopped platelets exhibited similar levels of strength in flexure and compression. Overall, hybridized compression molding produced sandwich structures can be used to control the failure progression and to improve the structural characteristics of composite, especially under flexural loads. The trim scrap core sandwich configuration had mechanical properties comparable with the BMC core hybrid. Therefore, trim scrap upcycling can be an efficient approach to reducing the amount of material waste during the manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

Department of Materials Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.005 ↗
2. 2009
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.05210.1016/j.matpr.2016.03.052 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.28910.1016/j.procir.2017.03.289 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.002 ↗
8. Larson R · Society of Plastics Engineers Automotive Composites Conference Exhibition · 2018
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.1001110.1002/pc.10011 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.1321910.1002/app.13219 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10677910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106779 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.031 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.018 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.032 ↗
16. Kravchenko S · 2017
17. Kravchenko S · 2018
18. 10.1177/002199831770725310.1177/0021998317707253 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.4471110.1002/app.44711 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.19710.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.197 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.006 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168441875436010.1177/0731684418754360 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168441349286710.1177/0731684413492867 ↗
24. 10.1177/109963621351249810.1177/1099636213512498 ↗
25. 10.1520/D7264_D7264M-1510.1520/D7264_D7264M-15 ↗
26. 10.1520/D3410_D3410M-1610.1520/D3410_D3410M-16 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.046 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.01210.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.03.012 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983920260180410.1177/002199839202601804 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2019.05.020 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09110.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.091 ↗
32. 10.1098/rspa.1997.011110.1098/rspa.1997.0111 ↗
33. 10.1520/D0695-1510.1520/D0695-15 ↗