Sustainable recycling of polypropylene waste: Characterization and statistical analysis of wood husk-PP composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing emphasis on sustainability and circular economy has driven extensive efforts in recycling and reusing polymer materials, widely used across various industries. While significant progress has been made in recycling polypropylene (PP), the development of polypropylene-ortho (PP-ortho) composite for prosthetics and orthotics remains underexplored. This study focuses on recycling PP-ortho waste by adding wood husk (WH) as a filler material for making PP-ortho composites for manufacturing assistive parts. Statistical analyses were performed considering PP, wood husk and particle size (PS) as input parameters to investigate the mechanical, thermal, and structural properties of the wood husk-PP composite. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were conducted to investigate the thermal stability of the composite. The results showed that mechanical properties improved with reduced wood husk content and smaller particle sizes, with optimal conditions achieved at 90 wt% PP, 10 wt% wood husks, and a particle size of 125 μm. Thermal analysis indicated a slight reduction in thermal stability with increased wood husk content. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) further confirmed that higher wood husk content and larger particle sizes led to weaker interfacial adhesion, fiber pullout, and reduced mechanical performance. This research advances sustainable recycling of polypropylene by developing composites for assistive parts in physical rehabilitation, bridging material science with impactful healthcare solutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Engineering and Technology
McMaster University
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s43586-022-00124-810.1038/s43586-022-00124-8 ↗
2. 10.1002/asia.20220097210.1002/asia.202200972 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2669010.1002/pc.26690 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.57410.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.574 ↗
5. 10.3390/polym1303045710.3390/polym13030457 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1101006210.3390/polym11010062 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978-0-443-22069-2.00003-610.1016/B978-0-443-22069-2.00003-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.00610.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.07610.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.076 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.1156010.1002/pen.11560 ↗
11. 10.1080/15440478.2020.185414510.1080/15440478.2020.1854145 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41529-022-00277-710.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
13. 10.1002/pi.247010.1002/pi.2470 ↗
14. 10.1177/2634983321100749710.1177/26349833211007497 ↗
15. Bortoletto A, Bovo E, Sorgato M, et al. Enhancing properties and manufacturability of post-consumer recycled polypropylene via gas counter-pressure injection molding. Sustain Mater Technol 2024; 40: e00897.
16. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.10766710.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107667 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.02.00610.1016/j.procir.2024.02.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2661710.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26617 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.10248610.1016/j.apmt.2024.102486 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-021-07930-610.1007/s00170-021-07930-6 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-022-06304-610.1038/s41598-022-06304-6 ↗
22. 10.1080/23311916.2020.178142410.1080/23311916.2020.1781424 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.20410.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.204 ↗
24. Zhao P, Dong Z, Zhang J, et al. Optimization of injection‐molding process parameters for weight control: converting optimization problem to classification problem. Adv Polym Technol 2020; 2020: 1–9.10.1155/2020/7654249 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1401002310.3390/polym14010023 ↗
26. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816874-5.00006-210.1016/B978-0-12-816874-5.00006-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.02010.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.020 ↗
28. 10.1002/9781119783473.ch1510.1002/9781119783473.ch15 ↗
29. 10.1080/09544828.2023.224785910.1080/09544828.2023.2247859 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.06.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.06.006 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1519403110.3390/polym15194031 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15397310.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153973 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10010110.1016/j.clema.2022.100101 ↗
34. Zhou S, Hrymak AN. Injection molding of polymers and polymer composites. MDPI, 2024, p. 1796.
35. 10.3390/polym1322403810.3390/polym13224038 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.05310.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.053 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10785910.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107859 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.37910.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.379 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10570-022-04498-610.1007/s10570-022-04498-6 ↗
40. 10.1007/s13399-023-04430-310.1007/s13399-023-04430-3 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma1515520610.3390/ma15155206 ↗
42. Khan MI, Karahan M. Testing of natural fiber composites. In: Natural Fibers to Composites: Process, Properties, Structures. Springer, 2022, pp. 131–148.
43. 10.1002/pc.2763310.1002/pc.27633 ↗
44. Dewi WU, Sutrisna R, Purnomo H, et al. Thermal decomposition of epoxy resin system used for filament winding. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing, 2023.
45. 10.1007/s13399-022-03332-010.1007/s13399-022-03332-0 ↗
46. 10.4236/ojs.2021.11100610.4236/ojs.2021.111006 ↗
47. 10.21449/ijate.110129510.21449/ijate.1101295 ↗
48. 10.54097/fcis.v5i1.1195710.54097/fcis.v5i1.11957 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1415318310.3390/polym14153183 ↗
50. 10.1007/s12649-023-02150-310.1007/s12649-023-02150-3 ↗
51. 10.1007/978-981-16-1606-8_610.1007/978-981-16-1606-8_6 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10839410.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108394 ↗
53. 10.3390/polym1419394210.3390/polym14193942 ↗
54. 10.3390/polym1611155610.3390/polym16111556 ↗
55. 10.3390/jcs704016310.3390/jcs7040163 ↗
56. 10.3390/jcs804012510.3390/jcs8040125 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma1412340610.3390/ma14123406 ↗
58. 10.1039/D3RA04151D10.1039/D3RA04151D ↗
59. 10.3390/polym1204078210.3390/polym12040782 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.57010.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.570 ↗
61. Haq S. Effect of materials content on dimensional stability, nano roughness and interfaced morphology for virgin or recycled polypropylene based wood composites. In: Engineered Wood Products for Construction. IntechOpen, 2021.
62. 10.3390/polym1308124810.3390/polym13081248 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11367810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113678 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10887310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108873 ↗
65. 10.1080/15440478.2020.187061910.1080/15440478.2020.1870619 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11765610.1016/j.fuel.2020.117656 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.01310.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.11214210.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112142 ↗
69. Geies A, Abdelazim M, Sayed AM, et al. Thermal, morphological and cytotoxicity characterization of hardwood lignins isolated by In-Situ sodium hydroxide-sodium bisulfate method. Nat Resour 2020; 11: 427–438.
70. 10.1002/app.5170210.1002/app.51702 ↗
71. 10.1515/epoly-2022-008010.1515/epoly-2022-0080 ↗
72. 10.1080/09276440.2021.187844110.1080/09276440.2021.1878441 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10943910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109439 ↗