journal article·2014-04

A phase-field model for grain growth with trijunction drag

A.E. Johnson, P.W. Voorhees

Acta Materialia· Volume 67
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A phase-field model has been developed to study the effect of triple junction (TJ) mobility on 2-D grain growth kinetics. The method captures the results of past work such as a linear increase in the average grain size with time, but can also follow the transition from TJ-limited to grain boundary energy-limited growth. The distribution of grain boundary curvature is examined. In the low TJ mobility simulations the distribution has a peak at zero curvature and approaches the grain boundary mobility-limited steady-state distribution at larger sizes. Even for extremely low TJ mobility, a small fraction of the grain boundary length has non-zero curvature and thus a lack of self-similarity is observed for all TJ-limited simulations, even when the average size is increasing linearly in time. We find that the topology of the grain structure is independent of the degree of TJ drag, within the range of parameters employed in the simulation. The effects of TJ mobility increase as the grain size decreases, suggesting that TJ mobility can play a significant role in nanocrystalline grain growth kinetics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Fortier · Scr Mater · 1991 · 25 · 17710.1016/0956-716X(91)90376-C ↗
2. Czubayko · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 586310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00241-9 ↗
3. Gottstein G, Shvindlerman LS. Boca Raton, Grain Boundary Migration in Metals: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, Applications, FL: CRC Press; 2009.10.1201/9781420054361 ↗
4. Palumbo · Scr Mater · 1990 · 24 · 134710.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J ↗
5. Horváth · Solid State Commun · 1987 · 62 · 31910.1016/0038-1098(87)90989-6 ↗
6. Bokstein · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater · 2001 · 302 · 15110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01367-8 ↗
7. Chellali · Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 344810.1021/nl300751q ↗
8. Palumbo · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater · 1989 · 113 · 13910.1016/0921-5093(89)90300-6 ↗
9. Shvindlerman · Z Metall · 2004 · 95 · 23910.3139/146.017941 ↗
10. Von Neumann · Metal Interfaces · 1952 · 108
11. Chokshi · Scr Mater · 2008 · 59 · 72610.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.009 ↗
12. Stender · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 1
13. Gottstein · Scr Mater · 2010 · 62 · 91410.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.017 ↗
14. Portavoce · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 96 · 21410210.1063/1.3435476 ↗
15. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 153510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.006 ↗
16. Protasova · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 251910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00142-2 ↗
17. Shvindlerman · Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater · 2001 · 302 · 14110.1016/S0921-5093(00)01366-6 ↗
18. Gottstein · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 70310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00391-3 ↗
19. Upmanyu · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 140510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00446-3 ↗
20. Mattissen · J Microsc · 2004 · 213 · 25710.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01281.x ↗
21. Zöllner · Comput Mater Sci · 2011 · 50 · 271210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.04.024 ↗
22. Barrales-Mora · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 54610.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.022 ↗
23. Weygand · Interface Sci · 1999 · 7 · 28510.1023/A:1008773411083 ↗
24. Krill · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 84210.1103/PhysRevLett.86.842 ↗
25. Paul · Scr Mater · 2011 · 65 · 510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.028 ↗
26. Farkas · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 9810.1103/PhysRevLett.98.165502 ↗
27. Saldana · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 02191010.1063/1.3072595 ↗
28. Upmanyu · Interface Sci · 1999 · 7 · 30710.1023/A:1008781611991 ↗
29. Gottstein · Mater Sci Technol · 2005 · 21 · 126110.1179/174328405X63944 ↗
30. Zöllner · Scr Mater · 2012
31. Chen · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1575210.1103/PhysRevB.50.15752 ↗
32. Fan · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 111510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00221-2 ↗
33. Weygand · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 655910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00318-8 ↗
34. Novikov · Scr Mater · 2005 · 52 · 85710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.013 ↗
35. Gottstein · Scr Mater · 2006 · 54 · 106510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.057 ↗
36. Phani · Phys Rev Lett · 1980 · 45 · 36610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.366 ↗
37. Kawasaki · Philos Mag (Abingdon) · 1989 · 60 · 39910.1080/13642818908205916 ↗
38. Enomoto · Acta Mater · 1990 · 38 · 76510.1016/0956-7151(90)90028-F ↗
39. Fortes · Acta Mater · 1985 · 33 · 169710.1016/0001-6160(85)90164-6 ↗
40. Cherkaoui · Atom Continuum Model Nanocrystall Mater · 2009 · 8110.1007/978-0-387-46771-9_4 ↗
41. Barrales-Mora · Philos Mag (Abingdon) · 2012 · 92 · 104610.1080/14786435.2011.637986 ↗
42. Provatas · Jom · 2007 · 59 · 8310.1007/s11837-007-0095-3 ↗
43. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1958 · 28 · 25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
44. Allen · Acta Mater · 1979 · 27 · 108510.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 ↗
45. Mumford · Commun Pure Appl Math · 1989 · 42 · 57710.1002/cpa.3160420503 ↗
46. Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher S, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow, University of California; 1994.10.1006/jcph.1994.1155 ↗
47. Osher S, Fedkiw R, Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces, vol. 153. Springer; 2003.10.1007/b98879 ↗
48. Russ JC. Boca Raton, The Image Processing Handbook, FL: CRC Press; 2006.10.1201/9780203881095 ↗
49. Gruber · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 118910.1088/0965-0393/14/7/007 ↗
50. McKenna IM, Poulsen SO, Lauridsen EM, Ludwig W, Voorhees PW, 2013 [in preparation].
51. Chen · J Am Ceram Soc · 1996 · 79 · 116310.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08568.x ↗
52. Chen · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 329710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00008-6 ↗
53. Poulsen · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 122010.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.032 ↗
54. Barrales-Mora · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 115110.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.013 ↗