journal article·2013-04

Determination of magnetic flux density at the nanometer-scale antiphase boundary in Heusler alloy Ni50Mn25Al12.5Ga12.5

Y. Murakami, K. Yanagisawa, K. Niitsu, H.S. Park, T. Matsuda, R. Kainuma, D. Shindo, A. Tonomura

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Understanding magnetic degradation in interface regions is important for materials science and technologies. An essential problem is the significant depression of ferromagnetism observed in an antiphase boundary (APB), which induces material functionalities/anomalies such as pinning of magnetic domain walls, etc. However, magnetization analysis on APB remains challenging due to the difficulty of collecting magnetic information from such a nanometer-scale interface region. We here use electron holography in order to obtain magnetic information from the narrow APB region in a Heusler alloy Ni 50 Mn 25 Al 12.5 Ga 12.5 . The magnetic flux density in APB (∼5.6 nm in breadth) was determined at 0.04 T, and was only 12% of the value for the APB-free matrix. This magnetic depression could be explained by atomic disordering in the APB region, ascertained by high-resolution atomic-column imaging. It is expected that our microscopic approach can be used to understand anomalous interface magnetism observed in various magnetic compounds and/or spin devices.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Yamada · Science · 2004 · 305 · 64610.1126/science.1098867 ↗
2. Barcaro · Nano Lett · 2011 · 11 · 554210.1021/nl203449y ↗
3. Kalisky · Nat Commun · 2012
4. Ishikawa · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 478910.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.034 ↗
5. Umetsu · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 4110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.014 ↗
6. Kainuma · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 95710.1038/nature04493 ↗
7. James · Philos Mag A · 1988 · 77 · 127310.1080/01418619808214252 ↗
8. Kakeshita · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 77 · 150210.1063/1.1290694 ↗
9. Chernenko · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 67 · 06440710.1103/PhysRevB.67.064407 ↗
10. 2005
11. Karaca · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 23310.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.004 ↗
12. Cahn · Acta Metall · 1961 · 9 · 79510.1016/0001-6160(61)90182-1 ↗
13. Ohno · Phil Mag · 2003 · 83 · 31510.1080/0141861021000039446 ↗
14. Ullakko · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
15. Venkateswaran · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 262110.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.003 ↗
16. Murakami · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 89510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.003 ↗
17. Yano · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 263610.2320/matertrans.MD200783 ↗
18. Park · Adv Funct Mater · 2012 · 22 · 343410.1002/adfm.201103052 ↗
19. Jourdan · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 09442210.1103/PhysRevB.75.094422 ↗
20. Kasama · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 10443210.1103/PhysRevB.73.104432 ↗
21. Wu · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 113210.1021/nl902973p ↗
22. Sofin · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 13443610.1103/PhysRevB.83.134436 ↗
23. De Graef · 2001
24. Tonomura · 1999
25. Hubert · 2000
26. Kato · J Electron Microsc · 2004 · 53 · 45110.1093/jmicro/dfh080 ↗
27. McCartney · Appl Phys Lett · 1998 · 72 · 138010.1063/1.121060 ↗
28. Murakami · Nat Nanotech · 2010 · 5 · 3710.1038/nnano.2009.342 ↗
29. Luo · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 97110.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.023 ↗
30. Sánchez-Alarcos · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2010 · 22 · 166001