On the proper selection of reflections for the measurement of bulk residual stresses by diffraction methods
Source abstract
Abstract
The suitability of various reflections for diffraction measurement of bulk residual stresses in austenitic steel after plane-strain deformation is investigated by self-consistent calculations. Earlier findings (for tensile-deformed fcc materials) that 311 is particularly well suited was not confirmed. In the present calculations 111 and 422 turned out to be the best (least bad) reflections. The new results have led us to reconsider the earlier findings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Macherauch E, Kloos KH. In: Macherauch E, Hauk, V, editors. Residual stresses in science and technology. Oberursel: DGM Informationsgesellschaft; 1987, p. 3.
2. MacEwen SR, Christodoulou N, Tomé CN, Jackman J, Holden TM, Faber Jr J, Hitterman RL. In: Kallend JS, Gottstein G, editors. Proceedings of ICOTOM 8. Warrendale: The Metallurgical Society; 1988, p. 825.
3. Tomé CN, Christodoulou N, Holt R, Woo CH, Lebensohn RA, Turner PA. In: Andersen SI, et al., editors. Numerical Predictions of Deformation Processes and the Behaviour of Real Materials. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1994, p. 169.
4. Turner PA, Tomé CA. Acta Metal Mater 1994;42:4143.10.1016/0956-7151(94)90191-0 ↗
5. Clausen B, Lorentzen T, Leffers T. Acta mater 1998;46:3087.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00014-7 ↗
6. Holden TM, Holt RA, Tomé CN. Mater Sci Eng 2000;A282:131.10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00774-1 ↗
7. Wang YD, Lin Peng R, McGreevy RL. Phil Mag Letters 2001;81:153.10.1080/09500830010017088 ↗
8. Dawson PR, Boyce D, MacEwen S, Rogge R. Metall Mater Trans 2000;31A:1543.10.1007/s11661-000-0165-4 ↗
9. Dawson P, Boyce D, MacEwen S, Rogge D. Mater Sci Eng 2001;A313:123.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00967-4 ↗
10. Clausen B, Lorentzen T, Bourke MAM, Daymond MR. Mater Sci Engng 1999;A259:17.10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00878-8 ↗
11. Wang YD, Lin Peng R, McGreevy R. Scripta Mater 1999;41:995.10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00248-1 ↗
12. Pang JWL, Holden TM, Wright TS, Mason TE. Acta Mater 2000;48:1131.10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00382-1 ↗
13. Wang YD, Lin Peng R, Wang W-L, McGreevy RL. Acta Mater 2002;50:1717.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00021-6 ↗
14. Margulies L, Lorentzen T, Poulsen HF, Leffers T. Acta Mater 2002;50:1771.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00028-9 ↗
15. Hutchinson JW. Proc Roy Soc London A 1970;319:247.10.1098/rspa.1970.0177 ↗
16. Taylor GI. J Inst Metals 1938;62:307.
17. Sachs G. Z Ver Dtsch Ing 1928;72:734.
18. Harren SV. J Mech Phys Solids 1991;39(3):361.10.1016/0022-5096(91)90018-J ↗
19. Kröner E. Acta Metal 1961;9:155.10.1016/0001-6160(61)90060-8 ↗
20. Molinari A, Canova GR, Ahzi S. Acta Metal 1987;35:2983.10.1016/0001-6160(87)90297-5 ↗