journal article·2000-07

Effect of surface free energy anisotropy on dendrite tip shape

G.B. McFadden, S.R. Coriell, R.F. Sekerka

Acta Materialia· Volume 48· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In previous work, approximate solutions were found for paraboloids having perturbations with four-fold axial symmetry in order to model dendritic growth in cubic materials. These solutions provide self-consistent corrections through second order in a shape parameter e to the Peclet number vs supercooling relation of the Ivantsov solution. The parameter e is proportional to the amplitude of the four-fold correction to the dendrite shape, as measured from the Ivantsov paraboloid of revolution. The equilibrium shape for anisotropic surface free energy to second order in the anisotropy is calculated. The value of e is determined by comparing the dendrite tip shape with the portion of the equilibrium shape near the growth direction, [001], for anisotropic surface free energy of the form γ = γ 0 [1+4 e 4 ( n 1 4 + n 2 4 + n 3 4 )], where the n i are components of the unit normal of the crystal surface. This comparison results in e =−2 e 4 −24 e 4 2 + O ( e 4 3 ), independent of the Peclet number. From the experimental value of e 4 , it is found that e ≈−0.012±0.004, in good agreement with the measured value e ≈−0.008 of LaCombe et al . ( Phys. Rev. E , 1995, 52 , 2778)
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. McFadden · J. Cryst. Growth · 2000 · 208 · 72610.1016/S0022-0248(99)00478-9 ↗
2. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Applied Mathematics Series 55. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, 1964.
3. Ivantsov · Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR · 1947 · 58 · 567
4. Kessler · Phys. Rev. A · 1987 · 36 · 412310.1103/PhysRevA.36.4123 ↗
5. Kessler · Acta metall. · 1988 · 36 · 269310.1016/0001-6160(88)90116-2 ↗
6. Ben Amar · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 58910.1103/PhysRevLett.71.589 ↗
7. Brener · JETP · 1995 · 80 · 341
8. LaCombe · Phys. Rev. E · 1995 · 52 · 277810.1103/PhysRevE.52.2778 ↗
9. Glicksman · ISIJ Int. · 1995 · 35 · 60410.2355/isijinternational.35.604 ↗
10. Koss · Chem. Engng Commun. · 1996 · 152–153 · 35110.1080/00986449608936573 ↗
11. Koss · Metals Mater. Trans. · 1999 · 30A · 317710.1007/s11661-999-0228-0 ↗
12. Glicksman · 1986 · 44
13. Muschol · Phys. Rev. A · 1992 · 46 · 103810.1103/PhysRevA.46.1038 ↗
14. Glicksman, M. E. and Marsh, S. P., in Handbook of Crystal Growth, Vol. 1B, ed. D. T. J. Hurle. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, p. 1104.
15. Cahn · Acta metall. · 1974 · 22 · 120510.1016/0001-6160(74)90134-5 ↗
16. Voorhees · J. Cryst. Growth · 1984 · 67 · 42510.1016/0022-0248(84)90035-6 ↗
17. Coriell, S. R. and McFadden, G. B., in Handbook of Crystal Growth, Vol. 1B, ed. D. T. J. Hurle. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 785–857.
18. Karma · Phys. Rev. E · 1998 · 57 · 434210.1103/PhysRevE.57.4323 ↗
19. LaCombe, J. C., Ph.D. thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, December 1998.
20. Pines · J. Cryst. Growth · 1996 · 167 · 38310.1016/0022-0248(96)00252-7 ↗
21. Sekerka · J. Cryst. Growth · 1997 · 171 · 30310.1016/S0022-0248(96)00485-X ↗