The geometry, topology and structure of amorphous solids
Source abstract
Abstract
Clusters of atoms can be divided into three categories depending on their topology. One of the categories provides the basis for development of a model of a perfectly random structure (ideal amorphous solid) using the non-equilateral triangle topology in the coordination shell. Metallic glasses solidify as amorphous solids with random arrangement of atoms. A model of Zr-based metallic glass has been constructed and described in terms of cluster topology, and compared with a recently published dynamic molecular model of the same alloy. It is shown that the pair distribution function for the ideal amorphous model relates to the pair correlation function obtained from the dynamic model. Debye X-ray scattering computations reveal the presence of vacancies and other flaws relative to the ideal amorphous solid. A shift in the peak position can be predicted using the Erhenfest formula. Two atomic displacement mechanisms involving a five-atom sub-cluster are identified as the fundamental means of compositional redistribution between clusters in the alloy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Friedrich W, Knipping P, von Laue M. Interferenz-Erscheinungen bei Röntgenstrahlen. Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München; 1912:303.
2. Shechtman · Phys Rev Lett · 1984 · 53 · 195110.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1951 ↗
3. Penrose · Bull Inst Math Appl · 1974 · 10 · 266
4. Sheng · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 41910.1038/nature04421 ↗
5. To · Solid State Sci · 2006 · 8 · 86810.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2006.02.042 ↗
6. Hui · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 37610.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.022 ↗
7. Leopardi · 2006
8. Brostow · Phys Rev · 1998 · 57 · 44810.1103/PhysRevB.57.13448 ↗
9. Stachurski · Phys Rev Lett · 2003 · 90/15 · 5502
10. Medvedev · J Chem Phys · 1990 · 11 · 833710.1063/1.459711 ↗
11. Clare · Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser A · 1986 · 405 · 32910.1098/rspa.1986.0056 ↗
12. Fürth · Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh · 1964 · 66 · 232
13. Proffen · J Appl Crystall · 1997 · 30 · 17110.1107/S002188989600934X ↗
14. Wang · Mater Forum · 2005 · 546
15. Guinier · 1963
16. Makinson · Adv X Ray Anal · 2000 · 42 · 407
17. Rachek · J Non-Cryst Solids · 2006 · 352 · 378110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.05.031 ↗
18. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
19. Frank · Acta Crystall · 1958 · 11 · 18410.1107/S0365110X58000487 ↗
20. Borodin · Philos Mag · 1999 · 79 · 188710.1080/01418619908210398 ↗
21. Alvarez · Dalton Trans · 2006 · 204510.1039/B601681B ↗
22. Miracle · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 69710.1038/nmat1219 ↗
23. Martin · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 442710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.038 ↗
24. Liu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 276010.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.019 ↗
25. Stachurski · Polimery · 2001 · 46 · 30210.14314/polimery.2001.302 ↗
26. Welberry · 2004
27. Yavari · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 161110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.011 ↗