The role of specimen thickness in the fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth resistance of nanocrystalline platinum films
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Most empirical studies and numerical simulations of fatigue damage accumulation mechanisms for metals with nanoscale grains usually invoke grain boundary-mediated processes. However, our recent studies of ∼500 nm platinum films showed that when the grain morphology is stable in the presence of high stresses and/or elevated temperatures the slip of dislocations is of primary interest. These thin film metals exhibit low fracture toughness and inferior resistance to fatigue crack growth when compared to conventional microscale grained bulk forms of the materials. In this manuscript we explore how sample form (thickness) contributes to the fracture and fatigue crack growth behavior of platinum thin films. When the thickness of the films was doubled to ∼1 μm the tensile yield and ultimate strengths were slightly depressed (yield strength ∼1.3 GPa, ultimate tensile strength ∼1.45 GPa). However, the fracture toughness markedly improved (Kq value 25.4 MPa √m) and the fatigue crack growth resistance was very similar to bulk forms (power law exponent m ≈ 3.9). The progression and type of damage shows that sample form makes a critical and distinct contribution to the fatigue crack growth mechanisms in nanograined metals.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ames · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 425510.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.051 ↗
2. Potirniche · Eng Fract Mech · 2003 · 70 · 162310.1016/S0013-7944(02)00204-7 ↗
3. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 6192110.1063/1.2008377 ↗
4. Witney · Scr Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 202510.1016/0956-716X(95)00441-W ↗
5. Schiotz · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 375-377 · 97510.1016/j.msea.2003.10.175 ↗
6. Padilla · Exp Mech · 2010 · 50 · 510.1007/s11340-009-9301-2 ↗
7. Meirom · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 114110.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.047 ↗
8. Hemker · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 225310.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.023 ↗
9. Callister · 2007
10. Speidel · Platinum Metals Rev · 1981 · 25 · 2410.1595/003214081X2512431 ↗
11. Hanlon · 2005 · vol. 27
12. Yang · Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci · 2008 · 39 · 114510.1007/s11661-008-9487-4 ↗
13. Cavaliere · Int J Fatigue · 2009 · 31 · 147610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.05.004 ↗
14. Polcawich RG, Judy D, Pulskamp JS, Trolier-McKinstry S, Dubey M. 2007 IEEE MTT-S International microwave symposium, June 3–8 2007. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2007. p. 2083–6.
15. Polcawich · IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech · 2007 · 55 · 264210.1109/TMTT.2007.910072 ↗
16. Kruzic · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 259510.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.018 ↗
17. Materials science & engineering a structural materials properties10.1016/0921-5093(89)90115-9 ↗
18. Materials science & engineering a structural materials properties10.1016/0921-5093(89)90090-7 ↗
19. Liu · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 176310.1016/0956-7151(92)90119-Y ↗
20. Meirom · 2008
21. Williams · 2009
22. Crystallographic and crystallochemical database for minerals and their structural analogues
23. Farina · Corros Sci · 2004 · 46 · 225510.1016/j.corsci.2004.01.004 ↗
24. Lin HT, Brady MP, Richards RK, Layton DM. 15th international conference on wear of materials, vol. 259, no. 7–12; 2005. p. 1063–7.10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.042 ↗
25. Brandon · 2008
26. Tada · 2000
27. ASTM. Standard E8 – standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2002.
28. Suresh · 1998
29. Sanders · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 401910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00092-X ↗
30. Backofen · 1972
31. Romasco · Thin Sol Films · 2010 · 518 · 386610.1016/j.tsf.2010.02.007 ↗
32. Materials science & engineering a structural materials properties10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.197 ↗
33. Broek · 1974
34. Broberg · J Mech Phys Solids · 1971 · 19 · 40710.1016/0022-5096(71)90008-1 ↗
35. Cotterell · Int J Fract · 1977 · 13 · 26710.1007/BF00040143 ↗
36. Wang · Int J Fract · 2003 · 123 · 17710.1023/B:FRAC.0000007376.06477.e8 ↗
37. Sobotka · Eng Fract Mech · 2011 · 78 · 34310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.006 ↗
38. Yang · Metal Mater Trans A · 2008 · 39 · 114510.1007/s11661-008-9487-4 ↗
39. Boyce · Metal Mater Trans A · 2011 · 42 · 179310.1007/s11661-011-0708-x ↗
40. Farkas · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 94 · 16550110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.165502 ↗
41. Ritchie · Int J Fract · 2005 · 132 · 19710.1007/s10704-005-2266-y ↗
42. Botvina · Strength Mater · 1985 · 17 · 165310.1007/BF01523001 ↗
43. Barenblatt · Mech Solids · 1983 · 18 · 160
44. Barenblatt · Sov Mater Sci · 1986 · 22 · 5210.1007/BF00720866 ↗
45. Barenblatt · Fatigue Eng Mater Struct · 1980 · 3 · 19310.1111/j.1460-2695.1980.tb01359.x ↗
46. Ovid’ko · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 271810.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.004 ↗
47. Haslam · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 209710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00011-9 ↗
48. Upmanyu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 170710.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.036 ↗