Effect of internal oxidation on wear behavior of ultrafine-grained Nb–Zr
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of surface modification by internal oxidation on dry sliding wear behavior of ultrafine-grained (UFG) Nb–Zr was investigated using a pin-on-disc type tribometer. The results show that improvement in strength by grain refinement via equal-channel angular pressing/extrusion has no substantial effect on the wear resistance of the non-oxidized UFG samples as compared to the coarse-grained material. This was attributed to the complex wear mechanisms operating in this alloy, such as adhesion leading to smearing, tribo-chemical reactions resulting in strong oxidative wear and also abrasion bringing about scratches and deep grooves. However, internal oxidation by heat-treatment significantly improved the wear resistance of Nb–Zr, especially under low to medium applied pressures due to the hardened diffusion zone with ZrO2 nanoparticles formed in the subsurface layer. Moreover, the improvement was more pronounced in the UFG material, which is attributed to increased diffusion in the UFG microstructure. When the applied pressure was increased above 0.5 MPa, however, the wear rate increased considerably due to the elimination of the hardened subsurface layer. Still, even under high pressures, the oxidized samples demonstrated lower weight loss as compared to non-oxidized samples. Based on the investigations of the worn surfaces, it was determined that internal oxidation mostly eliminates the complex wear mechanisms operational in the non-oxidized samples, especially under low/medium loads. Improvement in wear properties by internal oxidation along with enhanced mechanical properties and previously demonstrated good biocompatibility and superior fatigue performance make internally oxidized UFG NbZr a promising candidate for biomedical applications in the human body.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Souza · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 159310.1007/s10853-007-2324-0 ↗
2. Nieh · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 71910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.025 ↗
3. Grobstein TL, Titran RH. NASA, technical memorandum, TM-100848; 1986.
4. Dickerson · Mater Sci Eng A · 2000 · 278 · 12110.1016/S0921-5093(99)00591-2 ↗
5. Niendorf · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 57110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.015 ↗
6. Meininger · Metall Mater Trans A · 1992 · 23 · 307710.1007/BF02646126 ↗
7. Niendorf · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 659610.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.015 ↗
8. Yao · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 281610.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.053 ↗
9. Janecek · Metal Mater · 2005 · 43 · 258
10. Hadzima · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 462 · 24310.1016/j.msea.2005.11.081 ↗
11. Balyanov · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 5 · 22510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.011 ↗
12. Hadzima · Mater Sci Forum · 2006 · 503–504 · 88310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.503-504.883 ↗
13. Valiev · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 510.1557/JMR.2002.0002 ↗
14. Purcek · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 517 · 9710.1016/j.msea.2009.03.054 ↗
15. Purcek · Int J Mater Res · 2007 · 98 · 33210.3139/146.101470 ↗
16. Purcek · Metall Mater Trans A · 2009 · 40 · 277210.1007/s11661-009-9940-z ↗
17. Heimann · Surf Coat Technol · 2006 · 201 · 201210.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.052 ↗
18. Heimann · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 82310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.029 ↗
19. Liu · Mater Sci Eng R · 2004 · 47 · 4910.1016/j.mser.2004.11.001 ↗
20. Kim · J Biomed Mater Res B · 2004 · 70 · 27010.1002/jbm.b.30032 ↗
21. Xia · Wear · 2005 · 258 · 180410.1016/j.wear.2004.12.016 ↗
22. Wang · Surf Coat Technol · 2006 · 201 · 8210.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.044 ↗
23. Kim · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 335110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.104 ↗
24. Alsaran · Surf Eng · 2011 · 27 · 20510.1179/026708410X12687356948391 ↗
25. Fei · Prog Org Coat · 2009 · 64 · 26410.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.034 ↗
26. Segal VM, Goforth RE, Hartwig KT. Texas A&M University. US patent no. 5400,633; 1995.
27. Barber · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 37310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.022 ↗
28. Haouaoui · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 547710.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.022 ↗
29. Douglass · J Phys IV · 1993 · 3 · 75
30. Rubitschek F, Niendorf T, Karaman I, Maier HJ. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011, in press. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.023.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.08.023 ↗
31. Kumar · Wear · 2011 · 270 · 41310.1016/j.wear.2010.12.007 ↗
32. Murakami · Wear · 2010 · 268 · 72110.1016/j.wear.2009.11.022 ↗
33. Li · Wear · 2004 · 257 · 86910.1016/j.wear.2004.04.001 ↗
34. Stott · Tribol Int · 1998 · 31 · 6110.1016/S0301-679X(98)00008-5 ↗
35. Lee · Wear · 2008 · 264 · 7510.1016/j.wear.2007.01.044 ↗
36. Pawar · Appl Surf Sci · 2011 · 257 · 611810.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.014 ↗