journal article·2012-08

Interactions between edge lattice dislocations and Σ11 symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in copper: A quasi-continuum method study

Wenshan Yu, Zhiqiang Wang

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 13-14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract “Positive” and “negative” interactions between specified numbers of piled-up lattice dislocations and + Σ 11 ( 3 ¯ 1 1 ¯ ) and - Σ 11 ( 1 ¯ 3 1 ) symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in two bi-grain models of copper have been studied using the quasi-continuum method. The mechanisms of both interactions in representative loading stages are analyzed in terms of the evolution of grain boundary (GB) configurations and Burgers vector conservation. A unified geometrical criterion is proposed to predict “hard” and “easy” dislocation transmission without explicitly defining the “positive” and “negative” dislocation/GB interactions. The pile-up of incoming dislocations has a remarkable influence on both “positive” and “negative” interactions, and can activate dislocation transmission at smaller external loadings. Critical stress analysis for relatively easier dislocation transmission in “negative” interactions reveals that they depend on the ratio of total shear stresses on the incoming and outgoing slip planes and the ratio of total normal and shear stresses on the outgoing slip plane. An analysis of the Burgers vectors of residuals produced from dislocation/GB interactions shows that GBs impeding dislocation motion have larger residual values.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Priester · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 309–310 · 43010.1016/S0921-5093(00)01696-8 ↗
2. de Koning · J Nucl Mater · 2003 · 323 · 28110.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.008 ↗
3. Dewald · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2011 · 19 · 05500210.1088/0965-0393/19/5/055002 ↗
4. Dewald · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 461510.1080/14786430701297590 ↗
5. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 02190910.1063/1.3072801 ↗
6. Bachurin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 523210.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.037 ↗
7. Lee · Metall Mater Trans A · 1990 · 21 · 243710.1007/BF02646988 ↗
8. Lee · Scripta Metall · 1989 · 23 · 79910.1016/0036-9748(89)90534-6 ↗
9. Lee · Philos Mag A · 1990 · 62 · 13110.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
10. Cheng · Philos Mag · 2008 · 88 · 54710.1080/14786430801894577 ↗
11. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 112610.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.020 ↗
12. Jin · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 116310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072 ↗
13. Dewald · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · 15 · S19310.1088/0965-0393/15/1/S16 ↗
14. Shenoy · Phys Rev Lett · 1998 · 80 · 74210.1103/PhysRevLett.80.742 ↗
15. Jang · Mater Lett · 2007 · 61 · 86810.1016/j.matlet.2006.06.004 ↗
16. Pestman · Scripta Metall · 1989 · 23 · 143110.1016/0036-9748(89)90072-0 ↗
17. Pestman · Philos Mag A · 1991 · 64 · 95110.1080/01418619108213958 ↗
18. King · Mater Sci Eng · 1984 · 66 · 22710.1016/0025-5416(84)90183-6 ↗
19. Sangid · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 28310.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.032 ↗
20. de Hosson · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 164 · 41510.1016/0921-5093(93)90704-I ↗
21. Pestman · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 251110.1016/0956-7151(92)90321-5 ↗
22. Kim · Mater Lett · 2006 · 60 · 336710.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.020 ↗
23. Hasnaoui · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 225110.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.018 ↗
24. Mrovec · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 317910.1080/14786430903246346 ↗
25. Bitzek · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 05500810.1088/0965-0393/17/5/055008 ↗
26. Brandl · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 11191410.1063/1.2784939 ↗
27. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 21210410.1103/PhysRevB.75.212104 ↗
28. Tsuru · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 01210410.1103/PhysRevB.79.012104 ↗
29. Shimokawa · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.75.144108 ↗
30. Ashmawi · J Eng Mater Technol · 2002 · 124 · 8810.1115/1.1421611 ↗
31. Nicola · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 208910.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.005 ↗
32. Ma · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 218110.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.004 ↗
33. Couzinie · Int J Plast · 2005 · 21 · 75910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.013 ↗
34. Norden · Ultramicroscopy · 1989 · 30 · 3310.1016/0304-3991(89)90170-8 ↗
35. Shilkrot · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 75510.1016/j.jmps.2003.09.023 ↗
36. Miller · J Comput-Aid Mater · 2002 · 9 · 20310.1023/A:1026098010127 ↗
37. Shenoy · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 61110.1016/S0022-5096(98)00051-9 ↗
38. Tadmor · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 73 · 152910.1080/01418619608243000 ↗
39. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
40. Hirth · 1982
41. Meyers · 2009
42. Aubry · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 22411610.1103/PhysRevB.73.224116 ↗
43. Livingston · Acta Metall · 1957 · 5 · 32210.1016/0001-6160(57)90044-5 ↗
44. Shen · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 323110.1016/0001-6160(88)90058-2 ↗
45. Fleck · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 47510.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
46. Forwood · 1991