journal article·2004-02

Experimentally determined content of a geometrically necessary dislocation boundary in copper

Rodney J McCabe, Amit Misra, Terence E Mitchell

Acta Materialia· Volume 52· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Weak beam and stereo transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to analyze the dislocation content of a crystallographic geometrically necessary dislocation boundary (GNB) in rolled copper. The GNB is oriented close to the ( 1 1 1) slip plane and is composed primarily of dislocations from the three highest stressed slip systems: 1 2 [ 1 1 0](1 1 1) , 1 2 [1 0 1]( 1 1 1) , and 1 2 [1 1 0]( 1 1 1) . The boundary also contains a large number of dislocation nodes and reaction products (junctions) of the three primary sets including junctions of the first two sets resulting in a Lomer lock configuration 1 2 [0 1 1](1 0 0) . The dislocation configuration within the boundary appears to be a low energy structure within the confines of the system. The general boundary minimum energy solution to Frank’s formula does not agree well with the observed configuration. Solutions containing high densities of dislocations with Burgers vectors from the highest stressed slip systems give more reasonable agreement. An alternate analysis of Frank’s formula considering only slip activity on two fcc slip planes also gives reasonable results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Bay · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1992 · 40 · 20510.1016/0956-7151(92)90296-Q ↗
2. Huang · Scripta Mater. · 1997 · 37 · 110.1016/S1359-6462(97)00072-9 ↗
3. Winther · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 218710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00027-6 ↗
4. Liu · Acta Mater. · 1998 · 46 · 581910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-8 ↗
5. Huang · Scripta Mater. · 1998 · 38 · 169710.1016/S1359-6462(98)00051-7 ↗
6. Godfrey · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 189710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00474-7 ↗
7. Hughes · Acta Mater. · 1997 · 45 · 10510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00153-X ↗
8. Wert · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 96910.1080/0141861031000064582 ↗
9. Steeds · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1966 · 292 · 34310.1098/rspa.1966.0139 ↗
10. Hughes · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1989 · 122 · 15310.1016/0921-5093(89)90627-8 ↗
11. Hughes · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 309–310 · 22010.1016/S0921-5093(00)01691-9 ↗
12. Hirth · 1982
13. Wert · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1995 · 43 · 415310.1016/0956-7151(95)00097-F ↗
14. Prinz · Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 1976 · 37 · 22310.1002/pssa.2210370129 ↗
15. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1983 · 60 · 710.1016/0025-5416(83)90073-3 ↗
16. Peeters · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 212310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00047-1 ↗
17. Cockayne · J. Microsc. · 1973 · 98 · 11610.1111/j.1365-2818.1973.tb03815.x ↗
18. Sevillano · 1981 · 185
19. Gemperle · Ultramicroscopy · 1995 · 60 · 20710.1016/0304-3991(95)00072-6 ↗
20. Duh · J. Nuclear Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 206410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00124-X ↗
21. Elementary dislocation theory
22. Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf · Philos. Mag. A. · 1999 · 79 · 95510.1080/01418619908210342 ↗
23. Wickham · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 457410.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4574 ↗
24. Madec · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.255508 ↗