journal article·2008-03

The influence of geometry on grain boundary motion and rotation

N. Bernstein

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Recent theoretical and simulation studies indicate that grain boundary motion is coupled to the translation and rotation of the adjacent grains. However, the geometry of the system can strongly modify this coupling. We simulate the evolution of grains in two geometries that are similar to experimental systems that have been studied. The first, a small circular grain embedded in a matrix consisting of two other grains, shows that rotation can be suppressed by geometric frustration, but the coupling slows the grain boundary motion. The second, a bicrystal cut into a wedge shape, shows that free boundaries can act as sinks for grain boundary dislocations thereby stopping or even reversing the rotation caused by grain boundary motion. These results show that an experimentally relevant theory of grain boundary motion needs to consider the effects of microstructure and sample geometry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Srinivasan SG, Cahn JW. In: Ankem S, Pande C. S, Ovid’ko I, Ranganathan S (Eds.) Science and technology of interfaces. Seattle, WA: TMS; 2002.
2. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 488710.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.048 ↗
3. Suzuki · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 502 · 15710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.502.157 ↗
4. Cahn · Phill Mag · 2006 · 86 · 396510.1080/14786430500536909 ↗
5. Upmanyu · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 170710.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.036 ↗
6. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
7. Li · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 22310.1016/0001-6160(53)90062-5 ↗
8. Bainbridge · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 32210.1016/0001-6160(54)90175-3 ↗
9. Fukutomi · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 144510.1016/0956-7151(91)90229-T ↗
10. Winning · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 21110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00321-9 ↗
11. Winning · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 35310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00343-3 ↗
12. Winning · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 290110.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.005 ↗
13. Herrmann · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 35310.1016/0001-6160(76)90010-9 ↗
14. Erb · Scripta Metall · 1979 · 13 · 6110.1016/0036-9748(79)90390-9 ↗
15. Chan · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 111310.1016/0001-6160(85)90205-6 ↗
16. Chan · Acta Metall · 1986 · 34 · 219110.1016/0001-6160(86)90164-1 ↗
17. Harris · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 262310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00467-9 ↗
18. Rath · Trans Met Soc AIME · 1969 · 245 · 1243
19. Hu · Metall Trans · 1970 · 1 · 318110.1007/BF03038435 ↗
20. Rath BB, Hu H. In: Hu H (Ed.) Nature and behavior of grain boundaries. Seattle, WA: TMS; 1972. 405–35.
21. B.B. Rath, private communication.
22. Allen · 1987
23. Press · 1992
24. Li · Trans Met Soc AIME · 1969 · 245 · 1591
25. Weingarten · J Mech Phys Solid · 2007 · 55 · 118210.1016/j.jmps.2006.11.011 ↗
26. Hsieh · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 213310.1016/0001-6160(89)90138-7 ↗
27. Kirch · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 93910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.010 ↗