journal article·2006-03

On the development of microstructure and texture heterogeneity in ECAE via route C

Saiyi Li, Irene J. Beyerlein, Carl T. Necker

Acta Materialia· Volume 54· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Deformation in every two passes of route C by equal channel angular extrusion (ECAE) is commonly viewed as severe forward and reverse shearing. Contrary to predictions by standard polycrystal models, microstructural observations and texture measurements of a variety of ECAE materials consistently show that the initial state of the material is not recovered after even-numbered passes in this route. For the first time, the factors governing the microstructural and texture evolutions during two passes of route C are investigated using orientation imaging microscopy (OIM) and multi-scale modeling. For a two-pass pure copper sample processed by a 90° die, a useful model example, the OIM measurements reveal that the variation in microstructure and texture across the sample thickness is significant and all the textures show shear-type characteristics. Using finite element simulations for the macroscopic deformation, self-consistent modeling for polycrystals, and a latent hardening model for single crystals, it is shown that the deviation from idealized simple shear deformation and the difference in the deformation between successive passes due to changes in material behavior play a primary role, while anisotropy in single-crystal hardening plays a relatively minor one. Textures predicted, considering the two main factors, are in good agreement with the measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Segal · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 271 · 32210.1016/S0921-5093(99)00248-8 ↗
2. Shan · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 41 · 35310.1016/S1359-6462(99)00188-8 ↗
3. Park · Metall Mater Trans A · 2001 · 32 · 300710.1007/s11661-001-0175-x ↗
4. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 382 · 21710.1016/j.msea.2004.04.067 ↗
5. Dumoulin · AIP Conf Proc · 2004 · 712 · 148510.1063/1.1766738 ↗
6. Li · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 485910.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.042 ↗
7. Beyerlein · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 135910.1080/09500830500040940 ↗
8. Li · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 109910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.008 ↗
9. Li · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 211110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.023 ↗
10. Li · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 108710.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.042 ↗
11. Dupuy · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 337 · 24110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00027-8 ↗
12. Shin · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 128510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00010-6 ↗
13. Ferrasse · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 368 · 2810.1016/j.msea.2003.09.077 ↗
14. Gibbs · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 39 · 169910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00384-4 ↗
15. Isaenkova · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 495–497 · 823
16. Perlovich · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 503–504 · 859
17. Rollet · 1988 · 473
18. Anand · Mech Mater · 1994 · 17 · 22310.1016/0167-6636(94)90062-0 ↗
19. Wu · Int J Plasticity · 1996 · 12 · 119910.1016/S0749-6419(96)00048-4 ↗
20. Beyerlein · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 410C–411C · 207
21. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 394 · 6610.1016/j.msea.2004.11.032 ↗
22. Iwahashi · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 35 · 14310.1016/1359-6462(96)00107-8 ↗
23. Alexander · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 410–411 · 48010.1016/j.msea.2005.08.149 ↗
24. Tomé · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 263510.1007/s11661-002-0385-x ↗
25. Tomé · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 163710.1016/0001-6160(84)90222-0 ↗
26. Hill · J Mech Phys Solids · 1966 · 14 · 9510.1016/0022-5096(66)90040-8 ↗
27. Beyerlein · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 345 · 12210.1016/S0921-5093(02)00457-4 ↗
28. Van Houtte · 2000
29. Taylor · J Inst Metals · 1938 · 62 · 307
30. Li · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2005 · 13 · 50910.1088/0965-0393/13/4/003 ↗