journal article·2006-11

Deformation and evolution of shear bands under compressive loading in bulk metallic glasses

J.Y. Lee, K.H. Han, J.M. Park, K. Chattopadhyay, W.T. Kim, D.H. Kim

Acta Materialia· Volume 54· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Shear band formation and failure mechanism in monolithic glasses and glass matrix composite exhibiting a wide range of plasticity were investigated by interrupted compression experiments. The major shear bands in monolithic glasses appear rapidly after a small deformation, and their numbers remain almost same in the later stages of deformation. The path of the crack growth does not coincide strictly with the shear band. The larger plastic strain in glasses exhibiting higher ductility is mainly accommodated in the primary shear band by forming larger shear offset prior to failure. The failure mechanism under compression is not pure shear, but mixed mode with evidence of a tensile component, which leads to the formation of microvoids (microcracks). Bridging of the microvoids leads to final fracture. In the case of glass composite containing particles, the microcracks at the interface arrest the propagation of the existing shear bands and form additional shear bands, improving plasticity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Masumoto · Mater Sci Eng · 1975 · 19 · 110.1016/0025-5416(75)90002-6 ↗
2. Pampilo · Scripta Met · 1972 · 6 · 91510.1016/0036-9748(72)90144-5 ↗
3. Spaepen · Acta Met · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
4. Greer · Science · 1995 · 267 · 194710.1126/science.267.5206.1947 ↗
5. Johnson · Mater Res Bull · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
6. Inoue · Acta Metall · 2000 · 48 · 279
7. Conner · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 242910.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.034 ↗
8. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 70510.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.023 ↗
9. Kim · Science · 2002 · 25 · 65410.1126/science.1067453 ↗
10. Schroers · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 25550610.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506 ↗
11. Bruck · Scripta Metall Mater · 1994 · 30 · 42910.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
12. Xing · Mater Sci Eng A · 1998 · 241 · 21610.1016/S0921-5093(97)00489-9 ↗
13. Mukai · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 107110.1016/S0966-9795(02)00137-1 ↗
14. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 116710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9 ↗
15. Sergueeva · Phil Mag · 2005 · 85 · 267110.1080/14786430500154059 ↗
16. Chang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 50910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.037 ↗
17. Steif · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 44710.1016/0001-6160(82)90225-5 ↗
18. Flores · J Mater Res · 1999 · 14 · 63810.1557/JMR.1999.0642 ↗
19. Xing · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 18020110.1103/PhysRevB.64.180201 ↗
20. Cang · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 81 · 102010.1063/1.1498864 ↗
21. Flores · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 32710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.049 ↗
22. Lund · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 115910.1016/j.intermet.2004.07.001 ↗
23. Lowhaphandu · Intermetallics · 2000 · 8 · 48710.1016/S0966-9795(99)00137-5 ↗
24. Ravichandran · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 408710.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.011 ↗
25. Wright · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 319–321 · 22910.1016/S0921-5093(01)01066-8 ↗
26. Ott · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 188310.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.037 ↗
27. Liu · Mater Chem Phys · 2005 · 93 · 17410.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.011 ↗
28. Flores · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 102510.1016/j.intermet.2004.05.004 ↗