journal article·2005-11

Comparative studies of microstructure and impedance of small-angle symmetrical and asymmetrical grain boundaries in SrTiO3

Zaoli Zhang, Wilfried Sigle, Roger A. De Souza, Wolfgang Kurtz, Joachim Maier, Manfred Rühle

Acta Materialia· Volume 53· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Several low-angle symmetrical [0 0 1]-tilt grain boundaries and an asymmetrical grain boundary with both tilt and twist components were examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, conventional transmission electron microscopy, and impedance spectroscopy. The symmetrical tilt grain boundaries consist of isolated dislocation cores and the Burgers vectors are translation vectors of the crystal. Strain analysis shows that the strain fields around the dislocation cores overlap with increasing misorientation angle. The a.c. impedance response of the low-angle grain boundaries reveals a marked blocking effect for charge transport across the low-angle symmetrical grain boundaries, which increases with increasing misorientation angle. In the case of the mixed asymmetrical grain boundary, however, the blocking effect is low despite the large misorientation. The resistance and electrical potential of this grain boundary were calculated and compared with those obtained from the symmetrical grain boundaries. A relationship between microstructure and macroscopic electrical property can approximately be arrived by considering anion vacancies to be preferentially situated in highly distorted regions such as dislocation cores.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Rodewald · J Am Ceram Soc · 2001 · 84 · 52110.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00693.x ↗
2. Hagenbeck · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 83 · 208310.1063/1.366941 ↗
3. Denk · J Electrochem Soc · 1997 · 144 · 352610.1149/1.1838044 ↗
4. Tanaka · Phil Mag Lett · 1997 · 75 · 2110.1080/095008397179877 ↗
5. Hutt · J Phys-Condens Matter · 2001 · 13 · 394910.1088/0953-8984/13/18/305 ↗
6. Mo · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 241610.1103/PhysRevB.60.2416 ↗
7. Ravikumar · Ultramicroscopy · 1993 · 52 · 55710.1016/0304-3991(93)90073-7 ↗
8. Dravid · Interface Sci · 2000 · 8 · 17710.1023/A:1008736805309 ↗
9. Pan · Mater Sci Form · 1996 · 207 · 42110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.207-209.421 ↗
10. McGibbon · Science · 1994 · 266 · 10210.1126/science.266.5182.102 ↗
11. Browning · Interface Sci · 1995 · 2 · 39710.1007/BF00222626 ↗
12. Browning · J Phys D · 1996 · 29 · 177910.1088/0022-3727/29/7/013 ↗
13. Kienzle · J Am Ceram Soc · 1997 · 80 · 163910.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03032.x ↗
14. Leonhardt · Electrochem Solid-State Lett · 1999 · 2 · 33310.1149/1.1390827 ↗
15. Fleig · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 237210.1063/1.372189 ↗
16. Hwang · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 76 · 262110.1063/1.126428 ↗
17. De Souza · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 05350210.1063/1.1853495 ↗
18. Kurtz · Z Metallkd · 2002 · 93 · 43210.3139/146.020432 ↗
19. Guo · J Electrochem Soc · 2001 · 148 · J5010.1149/1.1389344 ↗
20. Zhang · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 09410810.1103/PhysRevB.66.094108 ↗
21. Phillipp · Ultramicroscopy · 1994 · 56 · 110.1016/0304-3991(94)90141-4 ↗
22. Sigle · Philos Mag Lett · 2003 · 83 · 71110.1080/09500830310001621623 ↗
23. Du · J Mater Sci Technol · 2002 · 18 · 135
24. De Souza · J Am Ceram Soc · 2003 · 86 · 92210.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03398.x ↗
25. Fleig · Solid State Ionics · 2002 · 150 · 18110.1016/S0167-2738(02)00274-6 ↗
26. Zhang · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 21411210.1103/PhysRevB.66.214112 ↗