journal article·2012-04

Effect of pore geometry and loading direction on deformation mechanism of rapid prototyped scaffolds

Soodeh Amirkhani, Reza Bagheri, Alireza Zehtab Yazdi

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Rapid prototyping is a promising technique for producing tissue engineering scaffolds due to its capacity to generate predetermined forms and structures featuring distinct pore architectures. The objective of this study is to investigate the influences of different pore geometries and their orientation with respect to the compressive loading direction on mechanical responses of scaffolds. Plastic models of scaffolds with cubic and hexagonal unit cells were fabricated by three-dimensional (3-D) printing. An in situ imaging technique was utilized to study the progressive compressive deformation of the scaffold models. In both cubic and hexagonal geometries, organized buckling patterns relevant to each unit cell were observed at the onset of plastic deformation. These patterns were in good agreement with the elastic stress concentration patterns generated by finite element simulation. Uniaxial compression tests conducted on both geometries revealed that the stress–strain pattern may vary significantly by changing the loading direction. A secondary stress softening phenomenon was observed where limited pore deformation caused 3-D structure bending. However, when loading direction was adjusted such that deformation was localized on all pores simultaneously, a monotonically increasing stress was observed. These results accentuate the critical role of pore geometry and orientation with respect to the principal loading axis in designing functional tissue engineering scaffolds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Butscher · Acta Biomater · 2011 · 7 · 90710.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.039 ↗
2. Karageorgiou · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 547410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
3. Rezwan · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 341310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
4. Hutmacher · Biomaterials · 2000 · 21 · 252910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
5. Pancrazio · Biosens Bioelectron · 2007 · 22 · 280310.1016/j.bios.2006.12.023 ↗
6. Torres · Compos Sci Technol · 2007 · 67 · 113910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.018 ↗
7. Almeida · Med Eng Phys · 2010 · 32 · 77510.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.001 ↗
8. Dado · Semin Cell Dev Biol · 2009 · 20 · 65610.1016/j.semcdb.2009.02.001 ↗
9. Leong · Biomaterials · 2003 · 24 · 236310.1016/S0142-9612(03)00030-9 ↗
10. Sobral · Acta Biomater · 2011 · 7 · 100910.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 ↗
11. Bian · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 140110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.015 ↗
12. Wettergreen · Comput Aid Des · 2005 · 37 · 114110.1016/j.cad.2005.02.005 ↗
13. Melchels · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 420810.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.012 ↗
14. Mironov · Curr Opin Biotechnol · 2011 · 22 · 66710.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.006 ↗
15. Mironov · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 216410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084 ↗
16. Boland · Mater Sci Eng C · 2007 · 27 · 37210.1016/j.msec.2006.05.047 ↗
17. Guillotin · Trends Biotechnol · 2011 · 29 · 18310.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.008 ↗
18. Seyednejad · Acta Biomater · 2011 · 7 · 199910.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.018 ↗
19. Seck · J Control Rel · 2010 · 148 · 3410.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.111 ↗
20. Duan · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 449510.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.024 ↗
21. Yeong · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 202810.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.033 ↗
22. Gibson · 1997
23. Michailidis · Mech Mater · 2010 · 42 · 14210.1016/j.mechmat.2009.10.006 ↗
24. Gibson · J Biomech · 2005 · 38 · 37710.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.027 ↗
25. Gong · Int J Solids Struct · 2005 · 42 · 138110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.024 ↗
26. Jang · Int J Solids Struct · 2010 · 47 · 287210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.014 ↗
27. Zhou · Mech Mater · 2004 · 36 · 78110.1016/j.mechmat.2003.05.004 ↗
28. Alkhader · Int J Eng Sci · 2008 · 46 · 103510.1016/j.ijengsci.2008.03.012 ↗
29. Tekoglu · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 10910.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.06.001 ↗
30. Moroni · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 97410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.023 ↗
31. Zein · Biomaterials · 2002 · 23 · 116910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 ↗
32. Tellis · Mater Sci Eng C · 2008 · 28 · 17110.1016/j.msec.2006.11.010 ↗
33. Mondrinos · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 439910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.049 ↗
34. Xiong · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 45 · 77310.1016/S1359-6462(01)01094-6 ↗
35. Williams · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 481710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057 ↗
36. Woodfield · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 414910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.056 ↗
37. Guo · 2001
38. Stella · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 236510.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.001 ↗
39. Kapfer · Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 687510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.012 ↗
40. ASTM International. ASTM D 695-02, standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
41. ASTM International. ASTM D638-03, standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
42. Sudarmadji · Acta Biomater · 2011 · 7 · 53010.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.024 ↗