journal article·2003-09

Development of high strength and strongly cube textured Ni-4.5% W/Ni-15% Cr composite substrate for coated conductor application

V.Subramanya Sarma, J. Eickemeyer, A. Singh, L. Schultz, B. Holzapfel

Acta Materialia· Volume 51· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The development of thin, mechanically stronger and highly cube textured substrates is of great technological importance for increasing the engineering current density of the coated conductors. Nickel is a suitable substrate for this in view of its ability to form strong cube texture after heavy rolling and annealing and its excellent oxidation resistance. However, nickel is very soft (yield strength ~40 MPa) and this limits the processing to thin tapes. The ferromagnetism of Ni is also undesirable for ac application of coated conductors in magnetic fields. In the present paper we report on the development of Ni-4.5 at.% W/Ni-15 at.% Cr composite substrates of 80 and 40 μm thickness with strong cube texture, high yield strength (~200 MPa) and reduced magnetisation losses. The strong cube texture was obtained through an optimised two-step recrystallisation annealing following heavy cold working. It was found that the presence of non-cube texture forming alloy (Ni-15% Cr) in the inner core of the composite had no adverse affect on the growth of cube textured grains on the surface (Ni-4.5% W) even at a low substrate thickness of 40 μm. A significant improvement in the texture/misorientation distribution was observed in the CeO2 buffer layer deposited on the composite substrate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Norton DP, et al. Science 1996;274:755.10.1126/science.274.5288.755 ↗
2. Goyal A, et al. Appl Phys Lett 1996;69:1795.
3. Norton DP, et al. Mater Sci Eng B 1998;56:86.
4. Ceresara S, Boffa V, Petrisor T, Fabbri F, Scardi P. Int J Modern Physics B 1999;13:1035.10.1142/S0217979299000916 ↗
5. Eickemeyer J, Selbmann D, Opitz R, maher E, Prusseit W. Physica C 2000;341–348:2425.10.1016/S0921-4534(00)01145-X ↗
6. Reger N, deBoer B, Eickemeyer J, Opitz R, Holzapfel B, Schultz L. Inst Phys Conf Ser 167:2000;331.
7. Tuissi A, Masini A, Villa E, Evetts JE. Int J Modern Physics B, 2000;14:3139.10.1142/S0217979200003447 ↗
8. de Boer B, et al. Acta Mater 2001;49:1421.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00041-6 ↗
9. de Boer B, et al. IEEE Trans App Supercond 2001;11:3477.10.1109/77.919812 ↗
10. de Boer B, et al. Physica C 2001;351:38.10.1016/S0921-4534(00)01687-7 ↗
11. Eickemeyer J, et al. Supercond Sci Technol 2001;14:152.10.1088/0953-2048/14/3/306 ↗
12. Knauf J, Semerad R, Prusseit W, de Boer B, Eickemeyer J. IEEE Trans on Applied Superconductivity, 2001;11:2885.10.1109/77.919665 ↗
13. Gladstone TA, Moore JC, Wilkinson AJ, Governor CRM, IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2001;11:2923.10.1109/77.919674 ↗
14. Nekkanti RM, et al. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2001;11:3321.10.1109/77.919773 ↗
15. Thieme CLH, et al. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2001;11:3329.10.1109/77.919775 ↗
16. Rodionov DP, Gervaseva IV, Khlebnikova YV, Sokolov BK. Physic of Metals and Metallography 2001;92:232.
17. Glowacki BA, et al. J Mater Sci 2002;37:157.10.1023/A:1013174615103 ↗
18. Tomov RI, Kursumovic A, Majoros M, Kang DJ, Glowacki BA, Evetts JE. Supercond Sci Technol 2002;15:598.10.1088/0953-2048/15/4/320 ↗
19. Satyamurthy, et al. J Mater Res 2002;17:1543.
20. Thompson JR, Goyal A, Christen DK, Kroeger DM. Physica C 2002;370:16910.1016/S0921-4534(01)00937-6 ↗
21. Eickemeyer J, et al. Physica C 2002;372–376:814.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00914-0 ↗
22. Sarma VS, de Boer B, Reger N, Eickemeyer J, Opitz R, Holzapfel B. Mater Sci Forum 2002;408–412:1561.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.1561 ↗
23. Varesi E, et al. Physica C 2002;372–376:763.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00901-2 ↗
24. Tuissi A, Villa E, Zamboni M, Evetts JE, Tomov RI. Physica C 2002;372–376:759.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00900-0 ↗
25. Goyal A, et al. Physica C;2002:251.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00626-3 ↗
26. Nast R, Obst B, Goldacker W. Physica C 2002;372–376:733.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00894-8 ↗
27. Tomov R, et al. Physica C 2003;383:323.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)01965-2 ↗
28. Varesi E, et al. Supercond Sci Technol 2003;16:498.10.1088/0953-2048/16/4/313 ↗
29. de Boer B, Sarma VS, Reger N Eickemeyer J, Holzapfel B. Physica C 2002;372–376:798.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00910-3 ↗
30. Goyal A. US Patent No. 6,180,570; 2001.
31. Watanabe T, et al. HTS conductors, processing and applications, The 2002 International Workshop on Superconductivity (The 5th joint ISTEC/MRS Workshop), Honolulu, Hawai, USA; June 24–27, 2001, pp. 21–24.
32. Subramanya Sarma V, de Boer B, Eickemeyer J, Holzapfel B. Scripta Mater 2003;48:1167.10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00585-7 ↗
33. Subramanya Sarma V, de Boer B, Eickemeyer J, Holzapfel B. Acta mater 2003;51:3769.10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00191-5 ↗
34. de Boer B, Reger N, Holzapfel B. Proc. First Joint Int Conf On Recrystallisation and Grain Growth, Gottstein G, Moldov DA, editors. Berlin Heildelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2001, p. 1355.
35. Fernandez L, Holzapfel B, Schindler F, de Boer B, Schultz L. Physica C 2002;372–376:656.10.1016/S0921-4534(02)00823-7 ↗
36. de Boer B, Reger N, Opitz R, Eickemeyer J, Holzapfel B, Schultz L. Proc ICOTOM 12, Szupnar JA, editor. Ottawa: NRC Research Press; 1999, p. 944.
37. Goyal A, et al. Mater Res 1997;12:2924.10.1557/JMR.1997.0387 ↗
38. Arzt E. Acta mater 1998;46:5611.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00231-6 ↗
39. Holzapfel B, et al. IEEE Trans on Applied Superconductivity 2001;11:3872.10.1109/77.919911 ↗