Phase diagram versus diagram of solubility: What is the difference for nanosystems?
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Particles with diameters in the range of 1–100 nm are characterized by the fact that the ratio of the number of surface to volume atoms is not small. It is then obvious that the effects of the surface on the cohesive properties of the particle cannot be neglected. In particular, the equilibrium phase diagram of nanoparticles differs from the corresponding bulk one. It is size dependent. Moreover, it is argued here that, in nanosystems, the concept of equilibrium phase diagram has to be revised. It turns out that it is required to differentiate the solidus and liquidus curves and equilibrium curves after the first order phase transition for a nanosystem. The new notions of ‘solubility diagram’, ‘solidus’, ‘liquidus’, and ‘nanophase diagram’ outlined here provide an acceptable description of the phase transition phenomenon in a nanosystem.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Buffat · Phys Rev A · 1976 · 13 · 228710.1103/PhysRevA.13.2287 ↗
2. Couchman · Nature · 1977 · 269 · 48110.1038/269481a0 ↗
3. Damodara Das · J Appl Phys · 1990 · 68 · 210510.1063/1.346565 ↗
4. 1999
5. 2003
6. 2004
7. Petrov · 1982
8. Robbins · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 42 · 557910.1103/PhysRevB.42.5579 ↗
9. Nagaev · Usp Fiz Nauk · 1992 · 162 · 5010.3367/UFNr.0162.199209b.0049 ↗
10. Liang · Nanotechnology · 2003 · 14 · 43810.1088/0957-4484/14/4/306 ↗
11. Gladgkikh · Dokladu Academiji nayk SSSR · 1988 · 300 · 588
12. Wautelet · J Phys: Cond Mat · 2003 · 15 · 365110.1088/0953-8984/15/21/313 ↗
13. Vallée · Nanotechnology · 2001 · 12 · 6810.1088/0957-4484/12/1/312 ↗
14. Schmelzer · Z Phys Chemie (Leipzig) · 1990 · 271 · 56510.1515/zpch-1990-27172 ↗
15. Rusanov · 1967
16. Ulbricht · 1988
17. Gusak · Met Phys Adv Technol · 1999 · 18 · 659
18. Cacciuto · Nature · 2001 · 413 · 71110.1038/35099513 ↗
19. Jacobs · Science · 2001 · 293 · 180310.1126/science.1063581 ↗
20. Shirinyan · Met Phys Adv Technol · 2001 · 23 · 1555
21. Shirinyan · Philos Mag A · 2004 · 84 · 57910.1080/14786430310001635431 ↗
22. Jesser · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 14412110.1103/PhysRevB.69.144121 ↗
23. Gibbs · 1928
24. Christian · 1965
25. Shirinyan · Ukr Fiz J · 1999 · 44 · 883
26. Shirinyan · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 172010.1088/0957-4484/15/12/004 ↗
27. Shirinyan A, Wautelet M, Belogorodsky Y. J Phys: Cond Mat [submitted].
28. Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia. 4th ed. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand; 1968.
29. The New Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 9, Micropedia. Ready Reference. 15th ed. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.; 1998.
30. Seitz · 1940
31. Zernike · 1955
32. Gusak · Ukr Fiz J · 1990 · 35 · 725
33. Desre · Phys Rev Lett · 1990 · 64 · 153310.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1533 ↗
34. Shirinyan · Ukr Fiz J · 1997 · 42 · 1276
35. Hodaj · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 448510.1016/1359-6454(96)00085-7 ↗