Modeling of melting and erosion in high velocity microparticle impacts

1. Validation of the Preston–Tonks–Wallace strength model at strain rates approaching ∼1011 s−1 for Al-1100, tantalum and copper using hypervelocity impact crater morphologies10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.09.001 ↗

2. Towards better understanding of explosive welding by combination of numerical simulation and experimental study10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107649 ↗

3. Study of hypervelocity projectile impact on thick metal plates10.1155/2016/4313480 ↗

4. The effects of prior cold work on the shock response of copper10.1007/s40870-018-0149-3 ↗

5. Heterogeneous microstructural evolution during hydrodynamic penetration of a high-velocity copper microparticle impacting copper

6. Deposition characteristics of cold sprayed Inconel 718 particles on Inconel 718 substrates with different surface conditions10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.059 ↗

7. Adiabatic shear instability is not necessary for adhesion in cold spray10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.065 ↗

8. A model for oblique impacts on material surfaces10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120405 ↗

9. Impact-induced melting during accretion of the earth10.1186/s40645-016-0083-8 ↗

10. Planetary differences in impact melting10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00877-6 ↗

11. The role of post-shock heating by plastic deformation during impact devolatilization of calcite (CaCO 3)10.1029/2020GL091130 ↗

12. Crater ejecta scaling laws: fundamental forms based on dimensional analysis10.1029/JB088iB03p02485 ↗

13. Effect of impact velocity and angle on deformational heating and postimpact temperature10.1029/2022JE007266 ↗

14. Melting can hinder impact-induced adhesion10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.175701 ↗

15. Melting and ejecta produced by high velocity microparticle impacts of steel on tin10.1115/1.4051593 ↗

16. Melt-driven erosion in microparticle impact10.1038/s41467-018-07509-y ↗

17. Eutectic melting of alloy microparticles upon low velocity impact10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116763 ↗

18. Hypervelocity impact experiments in iron-nickel ingots and iron meteorites: implications for the NASA psyche mission10.1029/2019JE005927 ↗

19. A reevaluation of impact melt production10.1006/icar.1997.5713 ↗

20. Space shuttle debris and meteoroid impacts10.1016/j.asr.2003.12.008 ↗

21. X-ray radiography of microjetting from grooved surfaces in tin sample subjected to laser driven shock10.1088/1361-6439/ab2c56 ↗

22. X-ray diffraction from shock driven Sn microjets10.1063/5.0111216 ↗

23. Spall damage in single crystal tin under shock wave loading: a molecular dynamics simulation10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103991 ↗

24. Shock-induced bct-bcc transition and melting of tin identified by sound velocity measurements10.1063/1.3003325 ↗

25. Melting along the Hugoniot and solid phase transition for Sn via sound velocity measurements10.1063/1.4967515 ↗

26. High-pressure melt curve of shock-compressed tin measured using pyrometry and reflectance techniques10.1063/1.5132318 ↗

27. Quantification of impact-induced melt production in numerical modeling revisited10.1029/2022JE007426 ↗

28. Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x ↗

29. Enhancement of impact heating in pressure-strengthened rocks in oblique impacts10.1029/2019GL085174 ↗

30. A particle method for history-dependent materials10.1016/0045-7825(94)90112-0 ↗

31. Smooth particle hydrodynamics: status and future potential10.1504/PCFD.2007.013000 ↗

32. Numerical investigations of the effect of oblique impact on particle deformation in cold spraying by the SPH method10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.014 ↗

33. A smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) procedure for simulating cold spray process - A study using particles10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.036 ↗

34. Hypervelocity impacts on thin brittle targets: experimental data and SPH simulations10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.081 ↗

35. High velocity impact of metal sphere on thin metallic plate using smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method10.1007/s11709-012-0160-z ↗

36. C. Noble, A. Anderson, N. Barton, J. Bramwell, A. Capps, M. Chang, J. Chou, D. Dawson, E. Diana, T. Dunn, D. Faux, A. Fisher, P. Greene, I. Heinz, Y. Kanarska, S. Khairallah, B. Liu, J. Margraf, A. Nichols, R. Nourgaliev, M. Puso, J. Reus, P. Robinson, A. Shestakov, J. Solberg, D. Taller, P. Tsuji, C. White, J. White, ALE3D: an arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian multi-physics code, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2172/1361589.10.2172/1361589 ↗

37. Owen · 2010

38. Adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics: methodology. II10.1086/313100 ↗

39. A compatibly differenced total energy conserving form of SPH10.1002/fld.3912 ↗

40. Embedded smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1016/j.cma.2020.113003 ↗

41. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1088/0034-4885/68/8/R01 ↗

42. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics and its diverse applications10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101220 ↗

43. Impact modeling with smooth particle hydrodynamics10.1016/0734-743X(93)90065-F ↗

44. Material deformation and removal due to single particle impacts on ductile materials using smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1016/j.wear.2011.08.012 ↗

45. Numerical investigation of substrate melting and deformation during thermal spray coating by sph method10.1007/s11090-008-9158-7 ↗

46. Experimental investigation of liquid spall in laser shock-loaded tin10.1063/1.2400800 ↗

47. S. Sjue, Initial beta-tin stress-strain calibration, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2172/1503207.10.2172/1503207 ↗

48. Model of plastic deformation for extreme loading conditions10.1063/1.1524706 ↗

49. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗

50. Determination of parameters for Johnson-Cook dynamic constitutive and damage models for E250 structural steel and experimental validations10.1007/s11665-023-08733-4 ↗

51. Lesuer · 2001

52. Analytic model of the shear modulus at all temperatures and densities10.1103/PhysRevB.67.094107 ↗

53. C. Greeff, E. Chisolm, D. George, SESAME 2161: An explicit Multiphase Equation of State For Tin., Los Alamos National Laboratory, n.d.

54. A multi-phase modeling framework suitable for dynamic applications10.3390/met12111844 ↗

55. Calibration and validation of the foundation for a multiphase strength model for tin10.1063/5.0207405 ↗

56. The latent energy remaining in a metal after cold working

57. Energy storage under high-rate compression of single crystal tantalum10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118253 ↗

58. The Taylor–Quinney coefficients and strain hardening of commercially pure titanium, iron, copper, and tin in high rate compression10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103940 ↗

59. On the dynamically stored energy of cold work in pure single crystal and polycrystalline copper10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.029 ↗

60. Measuring the strength of ductile microparticles at extreme strain rates10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116446 ↗

61. Steinberg · 1996

62. Microparticle impact-bonding modes for mismatched metals: from co-deformation to splatting and penetration10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.038 ↗

63. Rebound behaviour of spheres for plastic impacts10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00014-9 ↗

64. Energy dissipation during normal impact of elastic and elastic–plastic spheres10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.007 ↗

65. Effects of friction and plastic deformation in shock-comminuted damaged rocks on impact heating10.1002/2017GL076285 ↗

66. A review of metallic materials for latent heat thermal energy storage: thermophysical properties, applications, and challenges10.1016/j.rser.2021.111812 ↗

67. Toward new high temperature reference materials for calorimetry and thermal analysis10.1051/epjconf/20147700019 ↗

68. Surface tension of solid tin10.1063/1.1708134 ↗

69. Surface tension and its temperature coefficient of molten tin determined with the sessile drop method at different oxygen partial pressures10.1006/jcis.2002.8589 ↗

70. Marsh · 1980

71. On the transition from weak to strong shock response10.1063/5.0084553 ↗

72. Sewell · 1965

73. Microstructure effects on high velocity microparticle impacts of copper10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120329 ↗

74. Dynamic hardness evolution in metals from impact induced gradient dislocation density10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118807 ↗

75. Material hardness at strain rates beyond 106 s−1 via high velocity microparticle impact indentation10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.032 ↗