Bandwidth based electrical-analogue battery modeling for battery modules
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A technique for building a high fidelity electrical-analogue battery model by identifying the model parameters at the module level, as opposed to the cell level, is proposed in this paper. The battery model, which is represented by electrical circuit components, can be easily integrated into popular simulation environments for system level design and predictive analysis. A novel bandwidth based time-domain procedure is introduced for identifying the model parameters by selective assignment of the limited bandwidth of the battery model approximation according to the natural bandwidth of the system that uses the battery. The aim of this paper is to provide an accurate off-line electrical-analogue battery model for simulation of larger systems containing large-format batteries, as opposed to a detailed electrochemical model suitable for simulation of internal battery processes. The proposed procedure has been experimentally verified on a 6.8 Ah Ultralife UBBL10 Li-ion battery module which is a “microcosm” for a modern large-format battery pack. A maximum 0.25% error was observed during a performance test with arbitrary but bandwidth-limited charging and discharging intervals characteristic of a typical battery application.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Khaligh · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2010 · 59 · 280610.1109/TVT.2010.2047877 ↗
2. Chan · Proceedings of the IEEE · 2002 · 90 · 24710.1109/5.989873 ↗
3. Smith · Journal of Power Sources · 2006 · 160 · 66210.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.038 ↗
4. Wang · Journal of Power Sources · 2002 · 110 · 36410.1016/S0378-7753(02)00199-4 ↗
5. Chen · IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2006 · 21 · 50410.1109/TEC.2006.874229 ↗
6. Gao · IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies · 2002 · 25 · 49510.1109/TCAPT.2002.803653 ↗
7. R.C. Kroeze, P.T. Krein, in: Power Electronics Specialists Conference (2008) pp. 1336–1342.
8. Hu · Control Engineering Practice · 2009 · 17 · 119010.1016/j.conengprac.2009.05.002 ↗
9. Tremblay · 2007 · 284
10. Pedram · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2006 · 14 · 44110.1109/TVLSI.2006.876094 ↗
11. J. Zhang, S. Ci, H. Sharif, M. Alahmad, in: Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) (2010), pp. 672–675.
12. Wang · 2010 · 676
13. Plett · Journal of Power Sources · 2004 · 134 · 26210.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032 ↗
14. A.A.H. Hussein, N. Kutkut, I. Batarseh, in: Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) (2011) pp. 1790–1794.
15. Dubarry · Journal of Power Sources · 2007 · 174 · 85610.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.157 ↗
16. Hu · Journal of Power Sources · 2011 · 196 · 44910.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.037 ↗
17. Schweighofer · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2003 · 52 · 108710.1109/TIM.2003.814827 ↗
18. Tsang · Energy Conversion and Management · 2010 · 51 · 285710.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.024 ↗
19. N.K. Medora, A. Kusko, in: Telecommunications Energy Conference (2006) pp. 1–8.
20. Abu-Sharkh · Journal of Power Sources · 2004 · 130 · 26610.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.12.001 ↗
21. Kim · Journal of Power Sources · 2006 · 163 · 58410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.006 ↗
22. Vasebi · Journal of Power Sources · 2007 · 174 · 3010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.011 ↗
23. S. Pang, J. Farrell, J. Du, M. Barth, in: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (2001) pp. 1644–1649.
24. Mazzola · Review of Scientific Instruments · 1998 · 69 · 245910.1063/1.1148974 ↗
25. Istratov · Review of Scientific Instruments · 1999 · 70 · 123310.1063/1.1149581 ↗
26. Plett · Journal of Power Sources · 2006 · 161 · 136910.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.004 ↗