Design of polycrystalline metallic alloys under multi-scale uncertainty by connecting atomistic to meso‑scale properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification plays a pivotal role in advancing the development of reliable and high-performance material designs via multiscale materials modeling. This study focuses on modeling the uncertainty of meso‑scale mechanical properties, e.g. modulus of elasticity and yield strength of Ti-7Al, by incorporating the inherent randomness of substitutional atoms of the alloy and its microstructural texture. A molecular dynamics approach is employed to probe the epistemic uncertainty of single-crystal properties. Moreover, the aleatoric uncertainty is quantified using the experimental microstructural texture data of a previous investigation. The propagation of the epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty on the homogenized properties is investigated using an analytical uncertainty quantification method. Subsequently, the Ti-7Al alloy microstructures are designed to improve meso‑scale mechanical properties under uncertainty by integrating the analytical method into the optimization scheme.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics10.1098/rsta.2020.0082 ↗
2. Integrated computational materials engineering: a new paradigm for the global materials profession10.1007/s11837-006-0223-5 ↗
3. Uncertainty quantification of microstructural properties due to variability in measured pole figures10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.070 ↗
4. Uncertainty quantification in prediction of the in-plane young's modulus of thin films with fiber texture10.1109/JMEMS.2013.2279500 ↗
5. Measurement of uncertainty in orientation distribution function calculations10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.10.017 ↗
6. On the sampling of three-dimensional polycrystalline microstructures for distribution determination10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03531.x ↗
7. Uncertainty quantification in homogenization of heterogeneous microstructures modeled by XFEM10.1002/nme.3174 ↗
8. Three-dimensional stochastic analysis using a perturbation-based homogenization method for elastic properties of composite material considering microscopic uncertainty10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.09.008 ↗
9. The effect of multiple sources of uncertainty on the convex hull of material properties of polycrystals10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.08.010 ↗
10. Kriging-based approximate stochastic homogenization analysis for composite materials10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.011 ↗
11. Computational nonlinear stochastic homogenization using a nonconcurrent multiscale approach for hyperelastic heterogeneous microstructures analysis10.1002/nme.4293 ↗
12. Uncertainty quantification in computational stochastic multiscale analysis of nonlinear elastic materials10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.016 ↗
13. Ordering and the micromechanics of Ti–7Al10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.070 ↗
14. Attributes, characteristics, and applications of titanium and its alloys10.1007/s11837-010-0071-1 ↗
15. Perspectives on titanium science and technology10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043 ↗
16. 2003
17. Lengthscale-dependent, elastically anisotropic, physically-based hcp crystal plasticity: application to cold-dwell fatigue in Ti alloys10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.013 ↗
18. Crystallographic ordering of Al and Sn in α-Ti10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115221 ↗
19. Multi-scale numerical simulation of fracture behavior of nickel-aluminum alloy by coupled molecular dynamics and cohesive finite element method (CFEM)10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102735 ↗
20. Uncertainty quantification for Ti-7Al alloy microstructure with an inverse analytical model (AUQLin)10.3390/ma12111773 ↗
21. Crystal plasticity modeling and experimental validation with an orientation distribution function for Ti-7Al alloy10.3390/met7110459 ↗
22. P. Acar, ‘Design Optimization of Metallic Alloy Microstructures under Epistemic Uncertainty’, in AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 10.2514/6.2020-0884.10.2514/6.2020-0884 ↗
23. Multi-fidelity microstructure-induced uncertainty quantification by advanced Monte Carlo methods10.1016/j.mtla.2023.101705 ↗
24. Modelling material uncertainty in multiscale optimization using lattice microstructures
25. Generation and performance of special quasirandom structures for studying the elastic properties of random alloys: application to Al-Ti10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094203 ↗
26. The effect of randomness on the strength of high-entropy alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.032 ↗
27. Effective Band Structure of Random Alloys10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.236403 ↗
28. Grain-resolved temperature-dependent anisotropy in hexagonal Ti-7Al revealed by synchrotron X-ray diffraction10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110943 ↗
29. Atomistic modeling of the Ti–Al binary system10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.03.038 ↗
30. Temperature and strain rate dependent tensile properties of titanium carbide/nitride MXenes10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128581 ↗
31. Effects of temperature and strain rate on tensile properties of (Ag,Cu)-Sn intermetallic compounds: a molecular dynamics study10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.141 ↗
32. Dependence of mechanical and thermal deformation behaviors on crystal size and direction of Cu3Sn intermetallic: a molecular dynamics study10.1016/j.aej.2022.11.025 ↗
33. Tensile properties dependency on crystal size and direction of single crystal Ag3Sn intermetallic compound: a molecular dynamics study10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.188 ↗
34. M.M. Billah, R.I. Siddiquee, and M. Motalab, ‘Temperature dependent mechanical properties of inter-metallic compounds in nano-solder joints’, 2019, Accessed: Jan. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/download/94681778/1.pdf.10.1063/1.5115965 ↗
35. Continuum interpretation of virial stress in molecular simulations10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.016 ↗
36. Linear analysis of texture–property relationships using process-based representations of Rodrigues space10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.019 ↗
37. Representation of orientation and disorientation data for cubic, hexagonal, tetragonal and orthorhombic crystals10.1107/S0108767391006864 ↗
38. Computational modeling of f.c.c. deformation textures over Rodrigues’ space10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00044-6 ↗
39. Determination of volume fraction of the texture components in the Rodrigues fundamental region10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.030 ↗
40. Bunge · 1982
41. Construction of a pseudo-material representative of a real textured material from ODF or direct pole figures10.1155/TSM.14-18.169 ↗
42. On the representation of texture functions of cubic metals in Euler space
43. Determination of volume fractions of texture components with standard distributions in euler space10.1007/s11661-004-0033-8 ↗
44. Modeling crystallographic texture evolution with finite elements over neo-Eulerian orientation spaces10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00072-8 ↗
45. Linear solution scheme for microstructure design with process constraints10.2514/1.J055247 ↗
46. Reduced-Order modeling approach for materials design with a sequence of processes10.2514/1.J057221 ↗
47. Uncertainty quantification of microstructural properties due to experimental variations10.2514/1.J055689 ↗
48. Eliminating mesh sensitivities in microstructure design with an adjoint algorithm10.1016/j.finel.2018.10.001 ↗
49. Computational modeling of crystallographic texture evolution over cubochoric space10.1088/1361-651X/aad20b ↗
50. Design of β-Titanium microstructures for implant materials10.1016/j.msec.2020.110715 ↗
51. Machine learning reinforced crystal plasticity modeling under experimental uncertainty10.2514/1.J059233 ↗
52. Machine learning reinforced microstructure-sensitive prediction of material property closures10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110930 ↗
53. Effects of grain size, temperature and strain rate on the mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene – A molecular dynamics study10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.092 ↗
54. Pole figure inversion using finite elements over rodrigues space10.1080/073033002100000182 ↗