journal article·2021-08Open access

Predicting shear transmission across grain boundaries with an iterative stress relief model

Yang Su, Songyang Han, Philip Eisenlohr, Martin A. Crimp

Acta Materialia· Volume 215

Abstract

A new model is proposed to quantitatively describe the accommodation of shear from multiple deformation systems at a grain boundary. The model uses an iterative approach to sequentially determine the accommodating slip systems and their relative shear. The outcome of this iterative stress relief model is mainly controlled by the continuity of Burgers vector in the grain boundary and the evolution of the impinging stress tensor at the grain boundary. The model was tested by comparing predictions with observations of shear accommodation in a -titanium quantified using orientation informed slip trace analysis and quantitative atomic force microscopy. Similar comparisons were conducted between tangential continuity model predictions and the experimental observations. These comparisons show that the iterative stress relief model agrees much better with the observations when used to predict the accommodating deformation system(s) compared to the tangential continuity model. Critical resolved shear stress ratios used in this iterative stress relief were optimized by maximizing the accuracy of the model predictions. The ranges of the optimized critical resolved shear stress ratios were determined to be basal 〈a〉: prism 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈a〉: pyramidal 〈c+a〉: T1 twin = 1.0 : (0.8–1.0) : (1.0–1.3) : (1.6–9.5) : (3.0–9.5).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Plastic strain in metals
2. Polyslip in polycrystals10.1016/0001-6160(58)90117-2 ↗
3. TEM in situ deformation study of the interaction of lattice dislocations with grain boundaries in metals10.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
4. The role of heterogeneous deformation on damage nucleation at grain boundaries in single phase metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.09.002 ↗
5. The effect of grain boundary normal on predicting microcrack nucleation using fracture initiation parameters in duplex TiAl10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.046 ↗
6. A factor to predict microcrack nucleation at γ-γ grain boundaries in TiAl10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00216-1 ↗
7. Multiple slip in bicrystal deformation10.1016/0001-6160(57)90044-5 ↗
8. Dislocation pile-up and grain boundary interactions in 304 stainless steel10.1016/0036-9748(86)90467-9 ↗
9. Prediction of slip transfer mechanisms across grain boundaries10.1016/0036-9748(89)90534-6 ↗
10. On the criteria for slip transmission across interfaces in polycrystals10.1016/0956-716X(92)90173-C ↗
11. Compatibility of deformation in two-phase Ti-Al alloys: Dependence on microstructure and orientation relationships10.1007/BF02670762 ↗
12. In situ and tomographic analysis of dislocation/grain boundary interactions in α-titanium
13. Grain boundaries and interfaces in slip transfer10.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.003 ↗
14. Review on slip transmission criteria in experiments and crystal plasticity models10.1007/s10853-015-9553-4 ↗
15. Quantifying deformation processes near grain boundaries in alpha-titanium using nanoindentation and crystal plasticity modeling10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.007 ↗
16. A study of deformation twinning in a titanium alloy by X-ray diffraction contrast tomography10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.032 ↗
17. ECCI analysis of shear accommodations at grain boundaries in commercially pure alpha titanium10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102731 ↗
18. A criterion for slip transfer at grain boundaries in Al10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.12.010 ↗
19. Quasi-four-dimensional analysis of dislocation interactions with grain boundaries in 304 stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.036 ↗
20. Jump condition for GND evolution as a constraint on slip transmission at grain boundaries10.1080/14786430600951537 ↗
21. Tangential continuity of elastic/plastic curvature and strain at interfaces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.020 ↗
22. A continuum model for slip transfer at grain boundaries10.1186/s40323-020-00145-6 ↗
23. Characterization and modeling of heterogeneous deformation in commercial purity titanium10.1007/s11837-011-0161-8 ↗
24. Twin nucleation by slip transfer across grain boundaries in commercial purity titanium10.1007/s11661-009-0097-6 ↗
25. Simmons · 1971
26. Anisotropy in the plastic flow properties of single-crystal α titanium determined from micro-cantilever beams10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.064 ↗
27. The deformation of alpha-phase titanium
28. Classification of the critical resolved shear stress in the hexagonal-close-packed materials by atomic simulation: Application to α-zirconium and α-titanium10.1063/1.3599870 ↗
29. Strain hardening due to deformation twinning in α-titanium: constitutive relations and crystal-plasticity modeling10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.014 ↗
30. Stress-state dependence of slip in titanium-6Al-4V and other H.C.P. metals10.1016/0001-6160(81)90049-3 ↗
31. Slip band–grain boundary interactions in commercial-purity titanium10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.015 ↗
32. A new mechanism of strain transfer in polycrystals10.1038/s41598-020-66569-7 ↗
33. Deformation behavior of HCP Ti-Al alloy single crystals10.1007/s11661-002-0153-y ↗
34. A micromechanical analysis of the yielding behavior of individual Widmanstätten colonies of an α + β titanium alloy10.1007/s11661-004-0177-6 ↗
35. Methodology for estimating the critical resolved shear stress ratios of α-phase Ti using EBSD-based trace analysis10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.042 ↗