journal article·2024-12Open access

On the need to better control tooling in prepreg Automated Fibre Placement (AFP) deposition

Yi Wang, Bianca Timofte, Sarthak Mahapatra, Jonathan P.-H. Belnoue

Abstract

Efficient tack between ply and tooling is crucial for achieving accurate, defect-free and reliable placement of prepreg in Automated Fibre Placement (AFP). However, current industry practices for choosing AFP tooling’s material almost never account for this. The present contribution makes the scientific case for a more careful accounting of tack in the choice of AFP tooling material. Employing a modified probe test method, tack between prepreg, specifically Hexcel IM7-8552, and various tool surfaces was characterised. The effect of the roughness and material types on tack and its further influence on AFP deposition was investigated. The study shows that different materials have varying traction-separation behaviour, with metals showing higher values than composite materials. Release agent-treated samples exhibited the lowest tack, making them unsuitable for directly used in AFP. It is concluded that, by better considering tack, engineers can tailor their tooling material to enhance the quality and reliability of the deposition process. • Prepreg tack with different tooling and surface treatment are characterised. • The study quantitatively explores how tooling affects AFP deposition quality. • It is suggested that better accounting for tack can allow more robust deposition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: history, present and future10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.12.003 ↗
2. Automated fiber placement: a review of history, current technologies, and future paths forward10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100182 ↗
3. In situ joining of unidirectional Tapes on long fiber reinforced thermoplastic structures by thermoplastic automated fiber placement for scientific sounding rocket applications10.1016/j.procir.2019.09.015 ↗
4. A review on the tooling technologies for composites manufacturing of aerospace structures: materials, structures and processes10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106762 ↗
5. Campbell · 2006
6. A theoretical model to study the influence of tow-drop areas on the stiffness and strength of variable-stiffness laminates10.1177/0021998308097675 ↗
7. Experimental analysis of prepreg tack10.1007/s11340-009-9236-7 ↗
8. Understanding tack behaviour during prepreg-based composites' processing10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107284 ↗
9. Interaction of process parameters and material properties with regard to prepreg tack in automated lay-up and draping processes10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.001 ↗
10. Experimental determination and control of prepreg tack for automated manufacture10.1179/174328910X12777566997810 ↗
11. The experimental determination of prepreg tack and dynamic stiffness10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.014 ↗
12. Time–temperature equivalence in the tack and dynamic stiffness of polymer prepreg and its application to automated composites manufacturing10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.002 ↗
13. Effect of cutting edge radius on surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning of AISI 52100 steel10.1007/s00170-017-0065-z ↗
14. Standard test method for characterizing tack of prepregs using a continuous application-and-peel procedure
15. Budelmann · 2023
16. Adhesion-cohesion balance of prepreg tack in thermoset automated fiber placement. Part 1: adhesion and surface wetting10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100204 ↗
17. Modelling the effect of process conditions on steering-induced defects in automated fibre placement (AFP)10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107702 ↗
18. Surfaces and their measurement10.1016/S0301-679X(02)00184-6 ↗
19. Adhesion-cohesion balance of prepreg tack in thermoset automated fiber placement. Part 2: ply-ply cohesion through contact formation and autohesion10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100396 ↗
20. Analysis of contact area in a continuous application-and-peel test method for prepreg tack10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102849 ↗
21. Simulating prepreg tack in AFP process
22. A model of the manufacturing process of thermoplastic matrix composites10.1177/002199838702101103 ↗
23. An analysis of mechanisms governing fusion bonding of thermoplastic composites10.1177/089270579801100404 ↗
24. Experimental characterisation of the in-plane shear behaviour of UD thermoset prepregs under processing conditions10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105865 ↗
25. Hypo-viscoelastic modelling of in-plane shear in UD thermoset prepregs10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106400 ↗
26. Grankäll · 2022
27. A composite cost model for the aeronautical industry: methodology and case study10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.043 ↗